Teaching Professional Peer Review With the Use of Simulation

被引：1

作者：

Cole, Linda J. ^{[1
,3
]}

Andrighetti, Tia P. ^{[2
]}

Thrower, Eileen J. B. ^{[1
]}

Engstrom, Janet L. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Frontier Nursing Univ, Dept Midwifery & Womens Hlth, Versailles, KY USA

[2] Frontier Nursing Univ, Acad Affairs Dept, Versailles, KY USA

[3] POB 7154, Nikiski, AK 99635 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING | 2023年 / 37卷 / 02期

关键词：

just culture; patient safety; peer review; simulation; SAFETY; FOUNDATION; CULTURE;

D O I：

10.1097/JPN.0000000000000720

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

Background:Quality improvement practices such as peer review and just culture are important components of patient safety initiatives, and health professions students should be introduced to these practices during their education. Purpose:The purpose of this study was to evaluate a peer-review simulation learning experience using just culture principles in a graduate-level, online nursing education program. Methods:The students rated their learning experience with high, positive scores in all 7 domains on the Simulation Learning Experience Inventory. Responses to the open-ended question indicated that the students thought the experience provided opportunities for deep learning, increased confidence, and enhanced critical thinking skills. Conclusion:A peer-review simulation program using just culture principles provided a meaningful learning experience for graduate-level students in an online nursing education program.

引用

页码：108 / 115

页数：8

共 50 条

[31] Use of artificial intelligence and the future of peer review [J].

Bauchner, Howard ;

Rivara, Frederick P. .

HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR, 2024, 2 (05)

[32] PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH THE PEER REVIEW SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS [J].

Rajkaran, S. ;

Mammen, K. J. .

INTED2011: 5TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2011, :2303-2311

[33] Grade Language Heterogeneity in Simulation Models of Peer Review [J].

Feliciani, Thomas ;

Moorthy, Ramanathan ;

Lucas, Pablo ;

Shankar, Kalpana .

JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2020, 23 (03) :1

[34] The big consequences of small biases: A simulation of peer review [J].

Day, Theodore Eugene .

RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (06) :1266-1270

[35] A SIMULATION OF DISAGREEMENT FOR CONTROL OF RATIONAL CHEATING IN PEER REVIEW [J].

Grimaldo, Francisco ;

Paolucci, Mario .

ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, 2013, 16 (07)

[36] A simulation of disagreement for control of rational cheating in peer review [J].

Grimaldo, Francisco ;

Paolucci, Mario .

PROCEEDINGS 26TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION ECMS 2012, 2012, :676-+

[37] Use of an Obstetric Nursing Peer Review Committee to Foster a Culture of Patient Safety [J].

Chen, Jaclynn .

JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2021, 50 (05) :S28-S29

[38] A Qualitative Review of Literature on Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education: An Application of the SWOT Framework [J].

Thomas, Susan ;

Chie, Qiu Ting ;

Abraham, Mathew ;

Raj, Sony Jalarajan ;

Beh, Loo-See .

REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 84 (01) :112-159

[39] Learning clinical skills in the simulation suite: the lived experiences of student nurses involved in peer teaching and peer assessment [J].

Ramm, Dianne ;

Thomson, Anna ;

Jackson, Andrew .

NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2015, 35 (06) :823-827

[40] Use of simulation in teaching of anesthesiology in a school of medicine [J].

Aquino, Regis Borges ;

Smania, Maria Cristina .

SCIENTIA MEDICA, 2018, 28 (01)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →