Teaching Professional Peer Review With the Use of Simulation

被引：1

作者：

Cole, Linda J. ^{[1
,3
]}

Andrighetti, Tia P. ^{[2
]}

Thrower, Eileen J. B. ^{[1
]}

Engstrom, Janet L. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Frontier Nursing Univ, Dept Midwifery & Womens Hlth, Versailles, KY USA

[2] Frontier Nursing Univ, Acad Affairs Dept, Versailles, KY USA

[3] POB 7154, Nikiski, AK 99635 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING | 2023年 / 37卷 / 02期

关键词：

just culture; patient safety; peer review; simulation; SAFETY; FOUNDATION; CULTURE;

D O I：

10.1097/JPN.0000000000000720

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

Background:Quality improvement practices such as peer review and just culture are important components of patient safety initiatives, and health professions students should be introduced to these practices during their education. Purpose:The purpose of this study was to evaluate a peer-review simulation learning experience using just culture principles in a graduate-level, online nursing education program. Methods:The students rated their learning experience with high, positive scores in all 7 domains on the Simulation Learning Experience Inventory. Responses to the open-ended question indicated that the students thought the experience provided opportunities for deep learning, increased confidence, and enhanced critical thinking skills. Conclusion:A peer-review simulation program using just culture principles provided a meaningful learning experience for graduate-level students in an online nursing education program.

引用

页码：108 / 115

页数：8

共 50 条

[21] Peer review and its ethical implications [J].

Margaron, Franklin C. ;

McEvoy, Christian S. ;

Toncray, Kristina A. ;

Javid, Patrick J. .

SEMINARS IN PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2021, 30 (05)

[22] The use of simulation in teaching the basic sciences [J].

Eason, Martin P. .

CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 26 (06) :721-725

[23] Inter-professional Teaching via Simulation in Medical Education [J].

Alerte A.M. ;

Behme J. ;

Kosowicz L. ;

Nowicki T. ;

Pfeiffer C. .

Medical Science Educator, 2013, 23 (Suppl 3) :414-416

[24] Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review [J].

Bianchi, Federico ;

Squazzoni, Flaminio .

SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 49 (05) :791-800

[25] Peer Teaching in High-Fidelity Simulation Participant Experiences and Reflections [J].

Lawrence, Kay ;

Messias, DeAnne K. Hilfinger ;

Estrada, Robin Dawson ;

Long, Vicki .

NURSE EDUCATOR, 2018, 43 (06) :312-316

[26] Learning and teaching integrity as the bulwark of sound peer review mechanics [J].

Horne, Jeremy .

3RD INT CONF ON CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICAT/4TH INT CONF ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 3, 2006, :207-213

[27] LEARNING DYNAMICS OF THE PEER REVIEW: SOCIAL, COGNITIVE AND TEACHING ASPECTS [J].

Pozzi, Francesca ;

Ceregini, Andrea ;

Ferlino, Lucia ;

Persico, Donatella .

ICERI2014: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2014, :2591-2598

[28] Peer Teaching and Review: A Model for Writing Development and Knowledge Synthesis [J].

Badger, Karen .

SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2010, 29 (01) :6-17

[29] Development of a peer review of operative teaching process and assessment tool [J].

Torbeck, Laura ;

Dunnington, Gary .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 221 (02) :263-269

[30] Peer Review: A Vital Gatekeeping Function and Obligation of Professional Scholarly Practice [J].

Caputo, Richard K. .

FAMILIES IN SOCIETY-THE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SERVICES, 2019, 100 (01) :6-16

← 1 2 3 4 5 →