Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Clinicopathologic Analysis and a Predictive Model

被引:16
|
作者
Chen, Jingci [1 ]
Zong, Liju [1 ]
Wang, Pengyan [1 ]
Liu, Yilin [1 ]
Zhang, Hongkai [1 ]
Chang, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Lu, Zhaohui [1 ]
Li, Wencai [2 ]
Ma, Yihui [2 ]
Yu, Shuangni [1 ]
Chen, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Pathol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Dept Pathol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
metastasis; pancreas; relapse; risk; solid pseudopapillary neoplasm; SURGICAL RESECTION; CLINICAL-FEATURES; TUMOR; METASTASIS; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL; INVASION;
D O I
10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100141
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are rare. They are considered low-grade malignancies, and a small percentage of patients experience recurrence or metastasis. It is critical to investigate associated biological behavior and identify patients at a risk of relapse. This was a retrospective study of 486 patients with SPNs who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2021. Their clinicopathologic features, including 23 parameters and prognoses were analyzed. Six patients (1.2%) presented with synchronous liver metastasis. A total of 21 patients experienced recurrence or metastasis postoperatively. The overall and disease-specific survival rates were 99.8% and 100%, respectively. The 5-and 10-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 97.4% and 90.2%, respectively. Tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, and the Ki-67 index were independent predictors of relapse. Furthermore, a Peking Union Medical College Hospital-SPN risk model was built to evaluate the risk of relapse and compared it with the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor staging system (eighth edition, 2017). Risk factors included 3 parameters: tumor size (>9 cm), lymphovascular invasion status (presence), and Ki-67 index (>1%). Risk grades were available for 345 patients, who were divided into 2 groups: (1) low risk (n = 124) and (2) high risk (n = 221). The group with no risk factors was designated as low risk and had a 10-year RFS of 100%. The group associated with 1 to 3 factors was designated as high risk, with a 10-year RFS of 75.3%. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated, and the area under the curve was 0.791 for our model and 0.630 for the American Joint Committee on Cancer with respect to the cancer staging system. We validated our model in independent cohorts and demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.3%. In conclusion, SPNs are low-grade malignant neoplasms that rarely metastasize, and the 3 selected pathologic parameters can be used to predict their behavior. A novel Peking Union Medical College Hospital-SPN risk model was proposed for routine application to guide the patient counseling in clinical practice.(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospects and applications of enucleation in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas
    Wang, Rui
    Li, Jing
    Tan, Chun-Lu
    Liu, Xu-Bao
    Chen, Yong-Hua
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 14 (07) : 1227 - 1238
  • [2] Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: clinicopathologic features and surgical treatment of 19 cases
    Ren, Zeqiang
    Zhang, Pengbo
    Zhang, Xiuzhong
    Liu, Bin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 7 (10): : 6889 - 6897
  • [3] Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Clinicopathologic and Radiologic Features According to Size
    De Robertis, Riccardo
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Catania, Matteo
    Ambrosetti, Maria Chiara
    Capelli, Paola
    Salvia, Roberto
    D'Onofrio, Mirko
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (05) : 1073 - 1080
  • [4] The Sex Features of Patients With Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Retrospective Study
    Wei, Guangmin
    Luo, Qiong
    Fang, Jiankai
    Li, Xiaolou
    Shi, Yanhong
    Li, Yuqiong
    Sun, Liqi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [5] Aggressiveness of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas A literature review and meta-analysis
    Uy Hao, Emmanuel Ii
    Hwang, Ho Kyung
    Yoon, Dong-Sub
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Kang, Chang Moo
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (49)
  • [6] Retrospective evaluation of patients diagnosed solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas
    Ercelep, Ozlem
    Ozdemir, Nuriye
    Turan, Nedim
    Topcu, Turkan Ozturk
    Uysal, Mukremin
    Tanriverdi, Ozgur
    Demirci, Umut
    Taskoylu, Burcu Yapar
    Urakci, Zuhat
    Duran, Ayse Ocak
    Aksoy, Asude
    Menekse, Serkan
    Ozcelik, Melike
    Gumus, Mahmut
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2019, 43 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [7] Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of pancreas
    Wu, Jian-Hui
    Tian, Xiu-Yun
    Liu, Bo-Nan
    Li, Cheng-Peng
    Zhao, Mm
    Hao, Chun-Yi
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 32 (01) : 459 - 464
  • [8] Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of nine cases
    Ozguven, Banu Yilmaz
    Tuncel, Deniz
    Polat, Nedim
    Sakiz, Damlanur
    Kabukcuoglu, Fevziye
    Koksal, Hakan
    Kaya, Huseyin
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 58 (03) : 292 - 295
  • [9] Management of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of pancreas: A single center experience of 243 consecutive patients
    Liu, Mengqi
    Liu, Jiang
    Hu, Qiangsheng
    Xu, Wenyan
    Liu, Wensheng
    Zhang, Zheng
    Sun, Qiqing
    Qin, Yi
    Yu, Xianjun
    Ji, Shunrong
    Xu, Xiaowu
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2019, 19 (05) : 681 - 685
  • [10] Solid-pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas is still an Enigma: a Clinicopathological Review
    Zalatnai, Attila
    Kis-Orha, Viktoria
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (02) : 641 - 649