Feasibility and Reaction Thresholds of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Peanut and Nut Food Challenges Using Gingerbread Matrix

被引:1
|
作者
van de vorst-van der Velde, Kelly [1 ]
Andela, Pascalle [2 ]
de Groot, Hans [1 ]
Verhoeven, Dirk H. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Reinier Graaf Hosp, Dept Pediat Allergol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Reinier Graaf Hosp, Dietet Dept, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Children; Food hypersensitivity; Food provocation; Efficacy; EUROPEAN ACADEMY; ANAPHYLAXIS; VALIDATION; ALLERGY;
D O I
10.1159/000527415
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges are an important tool in diagnosing food allergies. PRACTALL recommends a dose-escalation schedule of 3-3,000 mg of food protein and a top dose of at least 2,000 mg to avoid false-negative results. This retrospective observational study tests the thresholds and feasibility using a previously published gingerbread matrix. Methods: Data of food provocations with peanuts and nuts in children from 2015 to 2019 in the Reinier de Graaf Hospital were analyzed. We performed the food challenge following a schedule of 1, 3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 1,000, and 3,000 mg allergen protein. The feasibility of ingestion of the gingerbread matrix was determined by analyzing the amount of consumed gingerbread. Results: 513 food challenges performed in 365 children (median age 6.9 years) were analyzed. Forty percent (204/513) of the food challenges were positive. Fifteen children already reacted at 1 mg protein (7%), 3 with a grade 3 reaction. The median cumulative amount of gingerbread matrix the children could eat on 1 day was 130.3 g. The median cumulative amount of allergen protein eaten was 2,585 mg; only 49% reached the minimum desired cumulative amount of 3,500 mg allergen protein. Despite that, there were no reported reactions at home in the 86% who introduced the allergen after a negative challenge. Conclusion: Seven percent of the children react on a starting dose of 1 mg of food protein. Therefore, when using the PRACTALL guidelines, early responders can be expected. Ingestion of a cumulative dose of 3,500 mg to reach a false-negative rate of maximum 5% is not feasible in most children using the gingerbread matrix. However, the cumulative dose may be reduced without increasing false-negative results, making challenges with the gingerbread matrix feasible for all age groups.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 193
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Changes in blood leukocyte distribution during double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis and suspected food allergy
    Beyer, K
    Renz, H
    Wahn, U
    Niggemann, B
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 116 (02) : 110 - 115
  • [42] Magnesium in the prophylaxis of migraine - A double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Pfaffenrath, V
    Wessely, P
    Meyer, C
    Isler, HR
    Evers, S
    Grotemeyer, KH
    Taneri, Z
    Soyka, D
    Gobel, H
    Fischer, M
    CEPHALALGIA, 1996, 16 (06) : 436 - 440
  • [43] Marfan Sartan: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Milleron, Olivier
    Arnoult, Florence
    Ropers, Jacques
    Aegerter, Philippe
    Detaint, Delphine
    Delorme, Gabriel
    Attias, David
    Tubach, Florence
    Dupuis-Girod, Sophie
    Plauchu, Henry
    Barthelet, Martine
    Sassolas, Francois
    Pangaud, Nicolas
    Naudion, Sophie
    Thomas-Chabaneix, Julie
    Dulac, Yves
    Edouard, Thomas
    Wolf, Jean-Eric
    Faivre, Laurence
    Odent, Sylvie
    Basquin, Adeline
    Habib, Gilbert
    Collignon, Patrick
    Boileau, Catherine
    Jondeau, Guillaume
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (32) : 2160 - U37
  • [44] Desmopressin in the treatment of nocturia:: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    van Kerrebroevk, Philip
    Rezapour, Masoumeh
    Cortesse, Ariane
    Thueroff, Joachim
    Riis, Anders
    Norgaard, Jens Peter
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (01) : 221 - 229
  • [45] Irbesartan in Marfan syndrome (AIMS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial
    Mullen, Michael
    Jin, Xu Yu
    Child, Anne
    Stuart, A. Graham
    Dodd, Matthew
    Aragon-Martin, Jose Antonio
    Gaze, David
    Kiotsekoglou, Anatoli
    Yuan, Li
    Hu, Jiangting
    Foley, Claire
    Van Dyck, Laura
    Knight, Rosemary
    Clayton, Tim
    Swan, Lorna
    Thomson, John D. R.
    Erdem, Guliz
    Crossman, David
    Flather, Marcus
    LANCET, 2019, 394 (10216) : 2263 - 2270
  • [46] A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Selegiline Transdermal System in Depressed Adolescents
    DelBello, Melissa P.
    Hochadel, Thomas J.
    Blanchard, Kimberly
    Azzaro, Albert J.
    Katic, Alain
    Khan, Arif
    Emslie, Graham
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 24 (06) : 311 - 317
  • [47] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of hydroxyurea in spinal muscular atrophy
    Chen, T. -H.
    Chang, J. -G.
    Yang, Y. -H.
    Mai, H. -H.
    Liang, W. -C.
    Wu, Y. -C.
    Wang, H. -Y.
    Huang, Y. -B.
    Wu, S. -M.
    Chen, Y. -C.
    Yang, S. -N.
    Jong, Y. -J.
    NEUROLOGY, 2010, 75 (24) : 2190 - 2197
  • [48] Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bepotastine Salicylate in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis
    Mo, Ji-Hun
    Jeong, Jin Hyeok
    Kim, Tae Hoon
    Kim, Seon-Tae
    Kim, Soo Whan
    Lee, Kun Hee
    Hong, Seung-No
    Kim, Hyo Yeol
    Kim, Dae Woo
    Kim, Dong-Young
    Kim, Chang-Hoon
    Cho, Seok Hyun
    Rhee, Chae-Seo
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (03) : E702 - E709
  • [49] Oral Immunotherapy for Egg Allergy: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study, with Postdesensitization Follow-Up
    Caminiti, Lucia
    Pajno, Giovanni B.
    Crisafulli, Giuseppe
    Chiera, Fernanda
    Collura, Mirella
    Panasci, Girolamo
    Ruggeri, Paolo
    Guglielmo, Francesco
    Passalacqua, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2015, 3 (04) : 532 - 539
  • [50] Double-blind placebo-controlled challenge showed that peanut oral immunotherapy was effective for severe allergy without negative effects on airway inflammation
    Kukkonen, Anna Kaarina
    Uotila, Riikka
    Malmberg, Leo Pekka
    Pelkonen, Anna Susanna
    Makela, Mika Juhani
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2017, 106 (02) : 274 - 281