Feasibility and Reaction Thresholds of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Peanut and Nut Food Challenges Using Gingerbread Matrix

被引:1
|
作者
van de vorst-van der Velde, Kelly [1 ]
Andela, Pascalle [2 ]
de Groot, Hans [1 ]
Verhoeven, Dirk H. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Reinier Graaf Hosp, Dept Pediat Allergol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Reinier Graaf Hosp, Dietet Dept, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Children; Food hypersensitivity; Food provocation; Efficacy; EUROPEAN ACADEMY; ANAPHYLAXIS; VALIDATION; ALLERGY;
D O I
10.1159/000527415
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges are an important tool in diagnosing food allergies. PRACTALL recommends a dose-escalation schedule of 3-3,000 mg of food protein and a top dose of at least 2,000 mg to avoid false-negative results. This retrospective observational study tests the thresholds and feasibility using a previously published gingerbread matrix. Methods: Data of food provocations with peanuts and nuts in children from 2015 to 2019 in the Reinier de Graaf Hospital were analyzed. We performed the food challenge following a schedule of 1, 3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 1,000, and 3,000 mg allergen protein. The feasibility of ingestion of the gingerbread matrix was determined by analyzing the amount of consumed gingerbread. Results: 513 food challenges performed in 365 children (median age 6.9 years) were analyzed. Forty percent (204/513) of the food challenges were positive. Fifteen children already reacted at 1 mg protein (7%), 3 with a grade 3 reaction. The median cumulative amount of gingerbread matrix the children could eat on 1 day was 130.3 g. The median cumulative amount of allergen protein eaten was 2,585 mg; only 49% reached the minimum desired cumulative amount of 3,500 mg allergen protein. Despite that, there were no reported reactions at home in the 86% who introduced the allergen after a negative challenge. Conclusion: Seven percent of the children react on a starting dose of 1 mg of food protein. Therefore, when using the PRACTALL guidelines, early responders can be expected. Ingestion of a cumulative dose of 3,500 mg to reach a false-negative rate of maximum 5% is not feasible in most children using the gingerbread matrix. However, the cumulative dose may be reduced without increasing false-negative results, making challenges with the gingerbread matrix feasible for all age groups.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 193
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation and standardisation of different matrices used for double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges to fish
    Vassilopoulou, E.
    Douladiris, N.
    Sakellariou, A.
    Cortes, S. V.
    Sinaniotis, A.
    Rivas, M. F.
    Papadopoulos, N. G.
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2010, 23 (05) : 544 - 549
  • [22] Development and validation of a standardized double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge matrix for raw hazelnuts
    Vandekerckhove, Marjolein
    Van Droogenbroeck, Bart
    De Loose, Marc
    Coudijzer, Katleen
    Coppens, Marc
    Gevaert, Philippe
    Lapeere, Hilde
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2018, 8
  • [23] Does severity of low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges reflect severity of allergic reactions to peanut in the community?
    Hourihane, JO
    Grimshaw, KEC
    Lewis, SA
    Briggs, RA
    Trewin, JB
    King, RM
    Kilburn, SA
    Warner, JO
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2005, 35 (09) : 1227 - 1233
  • [24] Late reactions in food-allergic children and adolescents after double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges
    Saleh-Langenberg, J.
    Flokstra-de Blok, B. M. J.
    AlAgla, N.
    Kollen, B. J.
    Dubois, A. E. J.
    ALLERGY, 2016, 71 (07) : 1069 - 1073
  • [25] Allergenicity of Wine Containing Processing Aids: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge
    Kirschner, S.
    Belloni, B.
    Kugler, C.
    Ring, J.
    Brockow, K.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 210 - 217
  • [26] Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial
    Fleischer, David M.
    Burks, A. Wesley
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Wood, Robert A.
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Sicherer, Scott H.
    Liu, Andrew H.
    Stablein, Donald
    Henning, Alice K.
    Mayer, Lloyd
    Lindblad, Robert
    Plaut, Marshall
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 131 (01) : 119 - U184
  • [27] Hazelnut allergy.: Validation of diagnostic procedures on the basis of double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges
    Ballmer-Weber, BK
    Vieths, S
    Bucher, C
    Lüttkopf, D
    Wüthrich, B
    ALLERGOLOGIE, 2000, 23 (06) : 285 - 291
  • [28] Parental Eczema Increases the Risk of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Reactions to Milk but Not to Egg, Peanut or Hazelnut
    van den Berg, Marten E.
    Flokstra-de Blok, Bertine M. J.
    Vlieg-Boerstra, Berber J.
    Kerkhof, Marjan
    van der Heide, Sicco
    Koppelman, Gerard H.
    Postma, Dirkje S.
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 158 (01) : 77 - 83
  • [29] ADVERSE REACTION TO FOOD - ASSESSMENT BY DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED FOOD CHALLENGE AND CLINICAL, PSYCHOSOMATIC AND IMMUNOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
    VATN, MH
    GRIMSTAD, LA
    THORSEN, L
    KITTANG, E
    REFNIN, I
    MALT, U
    LANGELAND, T
    NAALSUND, A
    DIGESTION, 1995, 56 (05) : 421 - 428
  • [30] Dose-response in double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis
    Sicherer, SH
    Morrow, EH
    Sampson, HA
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 105 (03) : 582 - 586