Feasibility and Reaction Thresholds of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Peanut and Nut Food Challenges Using Gingerbread Matrix

被引:1
|
作者
van de vorst-van der Velde, Kelly [1 ]
Andela, Pascalle [2 ]
de Groot, Hans [1 ]
Verhoeven, Dirk H. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Reinier Graaf Hosp, Dept Pediat Allergol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Reinier Graaf Hosp, Dietet Dept, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Children; Food hypersensitivity; Food provocation; Efficacy; EUROPEAN ACADEMY; ANAPHYLAXIS; VALIDATION; ALLERGY;
D O I
10.1159/000527415
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges are an important tool in diagnosing food allergies. PRACTALL recommends a dose-escalation schedule of 3-3,000 mg of food protein and a top dose of at least 2,000 mg to avoid false-negative results. This retrospective observational study tests the thresholds and feasibility using a previously published gingerbread matrix. Methods: Data of food provocations with peanuts and nuts in children from 2015 to 2019 in the Reinier de Graaf Hospital were analyzed. We performed the food challenge following a schedule of 1, 3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 1,000, and 3,000 mg allergen protein. The feasibility of ingestion of the gingerbread matrix was determined by analyzing the amount of consumed gingerbread. Results: 513 food challenges performed in 365 children (median age 6.9 years) were analyzed. Forty percent (204/513) of the food challenges were positive. Fifteen children already reacted at 1 mg protein (7%), 3 with a grade 3 reaction. The median cumulative amount of gingerbread matrix the children could eat on 1 day was 130.3 g. The median cumulative amount of allergen protein eaten was 2,585 mg; only 49% reached the minimum desired cumulative amount of 3,500 mg allergen protein. Despite that, there were no reported reactions at home in the 86% who introduced the allergen after a negative challenge. Conclusion: Seven percent of the children react on a starting dose of 1 mg of food protein. Therefore, when using the PRACTALL guidelines, early responders can be expected. Ingestion of a cumulative dose of 3,500 mg to reach a false-negative rate of maximum 5% is not feasible in most children using the gingerbread matrix. However, the cumulative dose may be reduced without increasing false-negative results, making challenges with the gingerbread matrix feasible for all age groups.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 193
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk Factors for Severe Reactions during Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges
    Yanagida, Noriyuki
    Sato, Sakura
    Asaumi, Tomoyuki
    Ogura, Kiyotake
    Ebisawa, Motohiro
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 172 (03) : 173 - 182
  • [2] False Positive Placebo Reaction in a Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge
    Reig Rincon de Arellano, I.
    Vazquez-Cortes, S.
    Sinaniotis, A. C.
    Fernandez-Rivas, M.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 241 - 242
  • [3] A comparison of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge and open food challenge
    Jessen, Frederik Bloch
    Mortz, Charlotte G.
    Eller, Esben
    Gudichsen, Julie H.
    Baekdal, Emil A.
    Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten
    ALLERGY, 2023, 78 (12) : 3204 - 3211
  • [4] Pitfalls in double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges
    Niggemenn, B.
    Beyer, K.
    ALLERGY, 2007, 62 (07) : 729 - 732
  • [5] Validation of novel recipes for masking peanuts in double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges
    Lafon, Inaki
    Lamperez, Marta
    Navarro, Montserrat
    Gastaminza, Gabriel
    Ferrer, Marta
    Tabar, Ana, I
    Gomez, Sara
    Agueros, Maite
    Garcia, Blanca E.
    D'Amelio, Carmen M.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 127 (05) : 575 - 578
  • [6] Utility of peanut-specific IgE levels in predicting the outcome of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges
    van Nieuwaal, Nancy H. G.
    Lasfar, Wafae
    Meijer, Yolanda
    Kentie, Petra A.
    Flinterman, Annebeth E.
    Pasmans, Suzanne G. A. M.
    Knulst, Andre C.
    Hoekstra, Maarten O.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 125 (06) : 1391 - 1392
  • [7] A Novel Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge Matrix for Milk and Raw Egg
    Vandekerckhove, Marjolein
    Van Droogenbroeck, Bart
    De Loose, Marc
    Coudijzer, Katleen
    Van Winckel, Myriam
    Gevaert, Philippe
    Lapeere, Hilde
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 179 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [8] New validated recipes for double-blind placebo-controlled low-dose food challenges
    Winberg, Anna
    Nordstrom, Lisbeth
    Strinnholm, Asa
    Nylander, Annica
    Jonsall, Anette
    Ronmark, Eva
    West, Christina E.
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 24 (03) : 282 - 287
  • [9] Validation and acceptability of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children
    Venter, Carina
    Maslin, Kate
    Patil, Veeresh
    Grundy, Jane
    Glasbey, Gillian
    Raza, Abid
    Vlieg-Boerstra, Berber
    Dean, Taraneh
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 27 (01) : 92 - 93
  • [10] Multicentre Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge Study in Children Sensitised to Cashew Nut
    van der Valk, Johanna P. M.
    van Wijk, Roy Gerth
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    de Groot, Hans
    Reitsma, Marit
    Vlieg-Boerstra, Berber
    Savelkoul, Huub F. J.
    Wichers, Harry J.
    de Jong, Nicolette W.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):