Performance assessment model of non-destructive technologies in inspecting concrete bridge decks

被引:9
作者
Abdelkhalek, Sherif [1 ,2 ]
Zayed, Tarek [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Tanta Univ, Fac Engn, Struct Engn Dept, Tanta, Egypt
关键词
Analytic network process; concrete bridge deck; inspection; non-destructive technologies; performance assessment; TOPSIS; SIMULATION; ECHO; AHP;
D O I
10.1080/15732479.2021.1937234
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Non-destructive testing (NDT) methods are typically utilized to thoroughly inspect existing defects in the concrete bridge deck and tackle the limitations of common inspection practices (e.g. visual inspection). Nevertheless, the reliability of inspection outcomes crucially depends on choosing the most appropriate NDT technologies. In this regard, a comprehensive Performance Assessment Model (PAM) was developed. The developed model incorporated 40 parameters to precisely assess the performance of different NDT technologies from diverse perspectives (e.g. defect detection capability, ease of use, speed, and cost). The required data were collected through a survey questionnaire. The model utilized the Analytic Network Process (ANP) technique to calculate the importance weight of each parameter, whereas the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was exploited to compute the performance index (PI) of NDT technologies. The outcomes of this study clearly illustrate the disparity in the performance of different NDT technologies. Furthermore, it was shown that none of these technologies could either exhibit the best performance in all the proposed parameters or efficiently identify all types of defects. Based on the PAM results, a selection model was proposed to assist bridge authorities and consultants in choosing the most efficient NDT technologies for inspection purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 237
页数:22
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [11] Baby S., 2013, International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, V4, P218, DOI [10.7763/ijimt.2013.v4.395, DOI 10.7763/IJIMT.2013.V4.395]
  • [12] Response rate in academic studies - A comparative analysis
    Baruch, Y
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1999, 52 (04) : 421 - 438
  • [13] David Ammu, 2021, Proceedings of SECON 2020. Structural Engineering and Construction Management. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (LNCE 97), P835, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-55115-5_75
  • [14] A Lean Implementation Success Model for the Construction Industry
    Demirkesen, Sevilay
    Bayhan, Hasan Gokberk
    [J]. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 32 (03) : 219 - 239
  • [15] Application of AHP in improving construction productivity from a management perspective
    Doloi, Hemanta
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (08) : 841 - 854
  • [16] Synthesis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Applications for Infrastructures
    Duque, Luis
    Seo, Junwon
    Wacker, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2018, 32 (04)
  • [17] Simulation-based deterioration patterns of water pipelines
    El-Abbasy, Mohammed S.
    Zayed, Tarek
    El Chanati, Hisham
    Mosleh, Fadi
    Senouci, Ahmed
    Al-Derham, Hassan
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2019, 15 (07) : 965 - 982
  • [18] A condition assessment model for oil and gas pipelines using integrated simulation and analytic network process
    El-Abbasy, Mohammed S.
    Senouci, Ahmed
    Zayed, Tarek
    Mosleh, Fadi
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2015, 11 (03) : 263 - 281
  • [19] Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Forman, E
    Peniwati, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 108 (01) : 165 - 169
  • [20] Using Expert Opinion to Quantify Uncertainty in and Cost of Using Nondestructive Evaluation on Bridges
    Hesse, Alex A.
    Atadero, Rebecca A.
    Ozbek, Mehmet E.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2017, 2017