Smart forecasting of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI before contrast agent administration

被引:3
|
作者
Liebert, Andrzej [1 ]
Das, Badhan K. [1 ]
Kapsner, Lorenz A. [1 ,2 ]
Eberle, Jessica [1 ]
Skwierawska, Dominika [1 ]
Folle, Lukas [3 ]
Schreiter, Hannes [1 ]
Laun, Frederik B. [1 ]
Ohlmeyer, Sabine [1 ]
Uder, Michael [1 ]
Wenkel, Evelyn [4 ,5 ]
Bickelhaupt, Sebastian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Inst Radiol, Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Med Ctr Informat & Commun Technol, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Pattern Recognit Lab, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Med Fak, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Radiol Munchen, Munich, Germany
[6] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Breast; Forecasting; Artifact; Neural networks (computer); CANCER; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10469-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate whether artifacts on contrast-enhanced (CE) breast MRI maximum intensity projections (MIPs) might already be forecast before gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration during an ongoing examination by analyzing the unenhanced T1-weighted images acquired before the GBCA injection.Materials and methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective analysis consisted of n = 2884 breast CE MRI examinations after intravenous administration of GBCA, acquired with n = 4 different MRI devices at different field strengths (1.5 T/3 T) during clinical routine. CE-derived subtraction MIPs were used to conduct a multi-class multi-reader evaluation of the presence and severity of artifacts with three independent readers. An ensemble classifier (EC) of five DenseNet models was used to predict artifacts for the post-contrast subtraction MIPs, giving as the input source only the pre-contrast T1-weighted sequence. Thus, the acquisition directly preceded the GBCA injection. The area under ROC (AuROC) and diagnostics accuracy scores were used to assess the performance of the neural network in an independent holdout test set (n = 285).ResultsAfter majority voting, potentially significant artifacts were detected in 53.6% (n = 1521) of all breast MRI examinations (age 49.6 +/- 12.6 years). In the holdout test set (mean age 49.7 +/- 11.8 years), at a specificity level of 89%, the EC could forecast around one-third of artifacts (sensitivity 31%) before GBCA administration, with an AuROC = 0.66.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the capability of a neural network to forecast the occurrence of artifacts on CE subtraction data before the GBCA administration. If confirmed in larger studies, this might enable a workflow-blended approach to prevent breast MRI artifacts by implementing in-scan personalized predictive algorithms.Clinical relevance statementSome artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI maximum intensity projections might be predictable before gadolinium-based contrast agent injection using a neural network.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts. center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:4752 / 4763
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of temporal resolution on the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced MRI in the conservatively treated breast
    Buckley, DL
    Mussurakis, S
    Horsman, A
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, 22 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [42] Weakly Supervised Breast Lesion Detection in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Sun, Rong
    Wei, Chuanling
    Jiang, Zhuoyun
    Huang, Gang
    Xie, Yuanzhong
    Nie, Shengdong
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2023, 36 (04) : 1553 - 1564
  • [43] Weakly Supervised Breast Lesion Detection in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Rong Sun
    Chuanling Wei
    Zhuoyun Jiang
    Gang Huang
    Yuanzhong Xie
    Shengdong Nie
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2023, 36 : 1553 - 1564
  • [44] Dynamic contrast-enhanced and ultra-high-resolution breast MRI at 7.0 Tesla
    Stehouwer, Bertine L.
    Klomp, Dennis W. J.
    van den Bosch, Maurice A. A. J.
    Korteweg, Mies A.
    Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A.
    Witkamp, Arjen J.
    van Diest, Paul J.
    Houwert, Karel A. F.
    van der Kemp, Wybe J. M.
    Luijten, Peter R.
    Mali, W. P. Th. M.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (11) : 2961 - 2968
  • [45] Dynamic contrast-enhanced and ultra-high-resolution breast MRI at 7.0 Tesla
    Bertine L. Stehouwer
    Dennis W. J. Klomp
    Maurice A. A. J. van den Bosch
    Mies A. Korteweg
    Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs
    Arjen J. Witkamp
    Paul J. van Diest
    Karel A. F. Houwert
    Wybe J. M. van der Kemp
    Peter R. Luijten
    W. P. Th. M. Mali
    Wouter B. Veldhuis
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 2961 - 2968
  • [46] Is there a role for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection and biopsy of MRI only visible breast lesions?
    Nykanen, Aki
    Arponen, Otso
    Sutela, Anna
    Vanninen, Ritva
    Sudah, Mazen
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 51 (04) : 386 - 392
  • [47] Automated artifact detection in abbreviated dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-derived maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of the breast
    Kapsner, Lorenz A.
    Ohlmeyer, Sabine
    Folle, Lukas
    Laun, Frederik B.
    Nagel, Armin M.
    Liebert, Andrzej
    Schreiter, Hannes
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Uder, Michael
    Wenkel, Evelyn
    Bickelhaupt, Sebastian
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (09) : 5997 - 6007
  • [48] Effect of protocol parameters on contrast agent washout curve separability in breast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: A simulation study
    Freed, Melanie
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2012, 68 (02) : 516 - 522
  • [49] Characterization of D-maltose as a T2-exchange contrast agent for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Goldenberg, Joshua M.
    Pagel, Mark D.
    Cardenas-Rodriguez, Julio
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (03) : 1158 - 1164
  • [50] A comparative study between the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast
    Fakhry, Sherihan
    Kamal, Rasha Mohamed
    Nada, Omnia Mokhtar
    Mohamed, Amira Emad Abo El Enien
    Hanafy, Mennatallah Mohamed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01)