Smart forecasting of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI before contrast agent administration

被引:3
|
作者
Liebert, Andrzej [1 ]
Das, Badhan K. [1 ]
Kapsner, Lorenz A. [1 ,2 ]
Eberle, Jessica [1 ]
Skwierawska, Dominika [1 ]
Folle, Lukas [3 ]
Schreiter, Hannes [1 ]
Laun, Frederik B. [1 ]
Ohlmeyer, Sabine [1 ]
Uder, Michael [1 ]
Wenkel, Evelyn [4 ,5 ]
Bickelhaupt, Sebastian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Inst Radiol, Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Med Ctr Informat & Commun Technol, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Pattern Recognit Lab, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Med Fak, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Radiol Munchen, Munich, Germany
[6] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Breast; Forecasting; Artifact; Neural networks (computer); CANCER; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10469-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate whether artifacts on contrast-enhanced (CE) breast MRI maximum intensity projections (MIPs) might already be forecast before gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration during an ongoing examination by analyzing the unenhanced T1-weighted images acquired before the GBCA injection.Materials and methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective analysis consisted of n = 2884 breast CE MRI examinations after intravenous administration of GBCA, acquired with n = 4 different MRI devices at different field strengths (1.5 T/3 T) during clinical routine. CE-derived subtraction MIPs were used to conduct a multi-class multi-reader evaluation of the presence and severity of artifacts with three independent readers. An ensemble classifier (EC) of five DenseNet models was used to predict artifacts for the post-contrast subtraction MIPs, giving as the input source only the pre-contrast T1-weighted sequence. Thus, the acquisition directly preceded the GBCA injection. The area under ROC (AuROC) and diagnostics accuracy scores were used to assess the performance of the neural network in an independent holdout test set (n = 285).ResultsAfter majority voting, potentially significant artifacts were detected in 53.6% (n = 1521) of all breast MRI examinations (age 49.6 +/- 12.6 years). In the holdout test set (mean age 49.7 +/- 11.8 years), at a specificity level of 89%, the EC could forecast around one-third of artifacts (sensitivity 31%) before GBCA administration, with an AuROC = 0.66.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the capability of a neural network to forecast the occurrence of artifacts on CE subtraction data before the GBCA administration. If confirmed in larger studies, this might enable a workflow-blended approach to prevent breast MRI artifacts by implementing in-scan personalized predictive algorithms.Clinical relevance statementSome artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI maximum intensity projections might be predictable before gadolinium-based contrast agent injection using a neural network.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts. center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:4752 / 4763
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Value of Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
    Goncalves, Mateus Aquino
    Pereira, Bruna T. L.
    Tavares, Camila A.
    Santos, Tainah M. R.
    da Cunha, Elaine F. F.
    Ramalho, Teodorico C.
    MINI-REVIEWS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 22 (06) : 865 - 872
  • [32] The association between breast cancer risk factors and background parenchymal enhancement at dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Hellgren, Roxanna
    Saracco, Ariel
    Strand, Fredrik
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Sundbom, Ann
    Hall, Per
    Dickman, Paul W.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (12) : 1600 - 1607
  • [33] Prognostication of anaplastic astrocytoma patients: application of contrast leakage information of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Kim, Hee Soo
    Kwon, Se Lee
    Choi, Seung Hong
    Hwang, Inpyeong
    Kim, Tae Min
    Park, Chul-Kee
    Park, Sung-Hye
    Won, Jae-Kyung
    Kim, Il Han
    Lee, Soon Tae
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (04) : 2171 - 2181
  • [34] Prognostication of anaplastic astrocytoma patients: application of contrast leakage information of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Hee Soo Kim
    Se Lee Kwon
    Seung Hong Choi
    Inpyeong Hwang
    Tae Min Kim
    Chul-Kee Park
    Sung-Hye Park
    Jae-Kyung Won
    Il Han Kim
    Soon Tae Lee
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 2171 - 2181
  • [35] Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening
    Coffey, Kristen
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 156
  • [36] Quantitative Nonlinear Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Breast
    Sridharan, Anush
    Eisenbrey, John R.
    Dave, Jaydev K.
    Forsberg, Flemming
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 207 (02) : 274 - 281
  • [37] Contrast-enhanced mammography in comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: which modality is appropriate for whom?
    Rasha Kamal
    Sahar Mansour
    Amr Farouk
    Mennatallah Hanafy
    Ahmed Elhatw
    Mohammed Mohammed Goma
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 52
  • [38] How to Recognize and Correct Artifacts on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Harper, Laura K.
    Faulk, Ellen A.
    Patel, Bhavika
    Collins, Patricia
    Rochman, Carrie
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (04) : 486 - 497
  • [40] Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: From Theory to Practice
    Kataoka, Masako
    Honda, Maya
    Sagawa, Hajime
    Ohashi, Akane
    Sakaguchi, Rena
    Hashimoto, Hina
    Iima, Mami
    Takada, Masahiro
    Nakamoto, Yuji
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (02) : 401 - 416