Smart forecasting of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI before contrast agent administration

被引:3
|
作者
Liebert, Andrzej [1 ]
Das, Badhan K. [1 ]
Kapsner, Lorenz A. [1 ,2 ]
Eberle, Jessica [1 ]
Skwierawska, Dominika [1 ]
Folle, Lukas [3 ]
Schreiter, Hannes [1 ]
Laun, Frederik B. [1 ]
Ohlmeyer, Sabine [1 ]
Uder, Michael [1 ]
Wenkel, Evelyn [4 ,5 ]
Bickelhaupt, Sebastian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Inst Radiol, Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Med Ctr Informat & Commun Technol, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Pattern Recognit Lab, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Med Fak, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Radiol Munchen, Munich, Germany
[6] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Breast; Forecasting; Artifact; Neural networks (computer); CANCER; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10469-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate whether artifacts on contrast-enhanced (CE) breast MRI maximum intensity projections (MIPs) might already be forecast before gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration during an ongoing examination by analyzing the unenhanced T1-weighted images acquired before the GBCA injection.Materials and methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective analysis consisted of n = 2884 breast CE MRI examinations after intravenous administration of GBCA, acquired with n = 4 different MRI devices at different field strengths (1.5 T/3 T) during clinical routine. CE-derived subtraction MIPs were used to conduct a multi-class multi-reader evaluation of the presence and severity of artifacts with three independent readers. An ensemble classifier (EC) of five DenseNet models was used to predict artifacts for the post-contrast subtraction MIPs, giving as the input source only the pre-contrast T1-weighted sequence. Thus, the acquisition directly preceded the GBCA injection. The area under ROC (AuROC) and diagnostics accuracy scores were used to assess the performance of the neural network in an independent holdout test set (n = 285).ResultsAfter majority voting, potentially significant artifacts were detected in 53.6% (n = 1521) of all breast MRI examinations (age 49.6 +/- 12.6 years). In the holdout test set (mean age 49.7 +/- 11.8 years), at a specificity level of 89%, the EC could forecast around one-third of artifacts (sensitivity 31%) before GBCA administration, with an AuROC = 0.66.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the capability of a neural network to forecast the occurrence of artifacts on CE subtraction data before the GBCA administration. If confirmed in larger studies, this might enable a workflow-blended approach to prevent breast MRI artifacts by implementing in-scan personalized predictive algorithms.Clinical relevance statementSome artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI maximum intensity projections might be predictable before gadolinium-based contrast agent injection using a neural network.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts. center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:4752 / 4763
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Negative Pressure Fixation Device to Reduce Motion Artifacts on Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: A Clinical Feasibility Study
    Balakrishnan, Asha
    Kacher, Daniel F.
    Gombos, Eva
    Smith, Darrell N.
    Carretero, Macarena
    Leon, Bill
    Freyre, Carlos V.
    Chavoustie, Steven E.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (02) : 430 - 436
  • [2] Comparison between Breast MRI and Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography
    Luczynska, Elzbieta
    Heinze-Paluchowska, Sylwia
    Hendrick, Edward
    Dyczek, Sonia
    Rys, Janusz
    Herman, Krzysztof
    Blecharz, Pawel
    Jakubowicz, Jerzy
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2015, 21 : 1358 - 1367
  • [3] Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study
    Clauser, Paola
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Kapetas, Panagiotis
    Hoernig, Mathias
    Weber, Michael
    Leone, Federica
    Bernathova, Maria
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (02) : 589 - 595
  • [4] Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis-Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    Lewin, John M.
    Chiang, Chia-Ling
    Hung, Bao-Hui
    Yang, Tsung-Lung
    Huang, Jer-Shyung
    Liao, Jia-Bin
    Pan, Huay-Ben
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (12) : 2501 - 2508
  • [5] Quantitative evaluation of contrast agent uptake in standard fat-suppressed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI examinations of the breast
    Kousi, Evanthia
    Smith, Joely
    Ledger, Araminta E.
    Scurr, Erica
    Allen, Steven
    Wilson, Robin M.
    O'Flynn, Elizabeth
    Pope, Romney J. E.
    Leach, Martin O.
    Schmidt, Maria A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (01) : 287 - 296
  • [6] Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    Moy, Linda
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (02) : 377 - 390
  • [7] Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast: How Is It Used?
    Kataoka, Masako
    Honda, Maya
    Ohashi, Akane
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Mori, Naoko
    Goto, Mariko
    Fujioka, Tomoyuki
    Mori, Mio
    Kato, Yutaka
    Satake, Hiroko
    Iima, Mami
    Kubota, Kazunori
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 21 (01) : 83 - 94
  • [8] Comparison of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis for lesion assessment Comparison of contrast-enhanced
    Huang, Hailiang
    Scaduto, David A.
    Liu, Chunling
    Yang, Jie
    Zhu, Chencan
    Rinaldi, Kim
    Eisenberg, Jason
    Liu, Jingxuan
    Hoernig, Mathias
    Wicklein, Julia
    Vogt, Sebastian
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Zhao, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 6 (03)
  • [9] Can unenhanced MRI of the breast replace contrast-enhanced MRI in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
    Marincola, Beatrice Cavallo
    Telesca, Marianna
    Zaccagna, Fulvio
    Riemer, Frank
    Anzidei, Michele
    Catalano, Carlo
    Pediconi, Federica
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2019, 60 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [10] Breast contrast imaging (contrast-enhanced mammography and MRI): What do the recommendations tell us?
    Rouche, Julia Arfi
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2024, 34 (03) : 123 - 128