Barriers to better bicycle parking for promoting intermodal journeys: An inter-organisational collaboration perspective

被引:2
作者
Cannon, Russell [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Chunli [1 ,2 ]
Hiselius, Lena Winslott [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Technol & Soc, LTH, Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] K2 Swedish Knowledge Ctr Publ Transport, Bruksgatan 8, SE-22236 Lund, Sweden
关键词
Intermodality; Governance; Collaboration; Bicycle parking; Access; -egress; Public transport; TRANSPORT; COORDINATION; PREFERENCES; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.10.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Organisational structures in the transport sector are often complex and fragmented, with different authorities responsible for different stages of a traveller's journey. In such circumstances, collaboration across organisational boundaries is required to facilitate intermodal journeys. This paper aims to provide empirically grounded insights into collaboration in transport planning, extending the literature to include cycling as an access and egress mode. This is done by examining the challenge of improving bicycle parking facilities at railway stations in Copenhagen, Denmark. Interviews with key actors involved in public transport and cycling planning reveal three main inter-organisational barriers to improving station bicycle parking in Copenhagen. First, station bicycle parking falls between the responsibilities of different organisations and levels of governance. Second, the absence of an established funding formula contributes to negotiation-oriented rather than collaborative interactions among the stakeholders. Third, the tension between cyclist satisfaction and rail passenger growth targets hinders collective action. In summary, despite Copenhagen's strong cycling identity and the prioritisation of this transportation mode in the city's political decision-making and transport planning, the issue of station bicycle parking highlights the complexity of multi-actor governance of intermodal journeys.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 73
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, Good, Better, Best the City Of Copenhagen's Bicycle Strategy 2011-2025
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, Prioriteringsplan For Cykelparkering, 2018-2025
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, The Bicycle Account 2022
  • [4] Collaborative governance in theory and practice
    Ansell, Chris
    Gash, Alison
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) : 543 - 571
  • [5] Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process
    Assarroudi, Abdolghader
    Nabavi, Fatemeh Heshmati
    Armat, Mohammad Reza
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Vaismoradi, Mojtaba
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2018, 23 (01) : 42 - 55
  • [6] Bryman A., 2022, Social research methods
  • [7] Upgrading the city: Enabling intermodal travel behaviour
    Dacko, Scott G.
    Spalteholz, Carolin
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2014, 89 : 222 - 235
  • [8] The qualitative content analysis process
    Elo, Satu
    Kyngaes, Helvi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [9] An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
    Emerson, Kirk
    Nabatchi, Tina
    Balogh, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2012, 22 (01) : 1 - 29
  • [10] European Commission, 2021, Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy