The Correlation of Aortic Neck Angle and Length in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Severe Neck Angulation for Prediction of Intraoperative Neck Complications and Postoperative Outcomes after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

被引:4
|
作者
Chinsakchai, Khamin [1 ]
Sirivech, Thana [1 ]
Moll, Frans L. [2 ]
Tongsai, Sasima [3 ]
Hongku, Kiattisak [1 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg,Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Vasc Surg Dept, NL-3584 Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Res Dept, Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
关键词
abdominal aortic aneurysm; severe neck angulation; neck length; index; outcomes; ENDURANT STENT GRAFT; INSTRUCTIONS; HOSTILE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12185797
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in a hostile neck has been associated with adverse outcomes. We aimed to determine the association of infrarenal aortic neck angle and length and establish an optimal cutoff value to predict intraoperative neck complications and postoperative outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients with an intact infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with severe neck angulation (>60 degrees) who underwent EVAR from October 2010 to October 2018. Demographic data, aneurysm morphology, and operative details were collected. The ratio of neck angle and length was calculated as the optimal cutoff value of the aortic neck angle-length index. The patients were categorized into two distinct groups using latent profile analysis, a statistical technique employed to identify concealed subgroups within a larger population by examining a predetermined set of variables. Intraoperative neck complications, adjunct neck procedures, and early and late outcomes were compared. Results: 115 patients were included. Group 1 (G1) had 95 patients with an aortic neck angle-length index <= 4.8, and Group 2 (G2) had 20 patients with an aortic neck angle-length index > 4.8. Demographic data and aneurysm morphology were not significantly different between groups except for neck length (p < 0.001). G2 had more intraoperative neck complications than G1 (21.1% vs. 55%, p = 0.005). Adjunctive neck procedures were more common in G2 (18.9% vs. 60%, p < 0.001). The thirty-day mortality rate was not statistically different. G1 patients had a 5-year proximal neck re-intervention-free rate comparable to G2 patients (93.7% G1 vs. 87.5% G2, p = 0.785). The 5-year overall survival rate was not statistically different (59.9% G1 vs. 69.2% G2, p = 0.891). Conclusions: Patients with an aortic neck angle-length index > 4.8 are at greater risk of intraoperative neck complications and adjunctive neck procedures than patients with an aortic neck angle-length index <= 4.8. The 5-year proximal neck re-intervention-free rate and the 5-year survival rate were not statistically different. Based on our findings, this study suggests that the aortic neck angle-length index is a reliable predictor of intraoperative neck complications during EVAR in AAA with severe neck angulation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thrombotic Occlusion of Stent Graft Limbs due to Severe Angulation of Aortic Neck in Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Kim, Minsu
    Kim, Myeong Gun
    Kang, Woong Chol
    Oh, Pyung Chun
    Lee, Ji Yeon
    Kang, Jin Mo
    Chung, Wook-Jin
    Shin, Eak Kyun
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2016, 46 (05) : 727 - 729
  • [2] Thromboembolic Complications After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm With Neck Thrombus
    Shintani, Tsunehiro
    Mitsuoka, Hiroshi
    Atsuta, Kouji
    Saitou, Takaaki
    Higashi, Shigeki
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 47 (03) : 172 - 178
  • [3] Effect of vertebral compression fractures on aortic neck angulation after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Shearkhani, Omid
    Rohringer, Taryn J.
    Eisenberg, Naomi
    Mafeld, Sebastian
    Tan, Kong T.
    Jaberi, Arash
    Roche-Nagle, Graham
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (05) : 1598 - 1604
  • [4] Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm With Severe Angulation of Infrarenal Aortic Neck by Gore Conformable Endograft
    Mascoli, Chiara
    Faggioli, Gianluca
    Goretti, Martina
    Gallitto, Enrico
    Pini, Rodolfo
    Logiacco, Antonino Maria
    Vacirca, Andrea
    Prof, Mauro Gargiulo
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2023, 30 (03) : 410 - 418
  • [5] Prognostic Role of Severe Infrarenal Aortic Neck Angulation in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
    Qayyum, Haisum
    Hansrani, Vivak
    Antoniou, George A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 62 (03) : 409 - 421
  • [6] Influence of infrarenal neck length on outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Leurs, Lina J.
    Kievit, Jur
    Dagnelie, Pieter C.
    Nelemans, Patty J.
    Buth, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2006, 13 (05) : 640 - 648
  • [7] Aortic Neck Length and Mortality After Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Powell, Janet T.
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130
  • [8] Kilt Technique as an Angle Modification Method for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Severe Neck Angle
    Kim, Tae-Hoon
    Jang, Ho-Jun
    Choi, Young Jin
    Lee, Chang Keun
    Kwon, Sung Woo
    Shim, Won-Heum
    ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 23 (02) : 96 - 103
  • [9] Early and late outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm compared between severe and non-severe infrarenal neck angulation
    Chinsakchai, Khamin
    Suksusilp, Pichawat
    Wongwanit, Chumpol
    Hongku, Kiattisak
    Hahtapornsawan, Suteekhanit
    Puangpunngam, Nattawut
    Moll, Frans L.
    Sermsathanasawadi, Nuttawut
    Ruangsetakit, Chanean
    Mutirangura, Pramook
    VASCULAR, 2020, 28 (06) : 683 - 691
  • [10] Outcomes of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Hostile Neck Anatomy
    Edward Choke
    Graham Munneke
    Robert Morgan
    Anna-Maria Belli
    Ian Loftus
    Robert McFarland
    Thomas Loosemore
    Matthew M. Thompson
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2006, 29 : 975 - 980