Investigation of the effects of arch size and implant angulation on the accuracy of digital impression using two intraoral scanners: An in vitro study

被引:1
作者
Geramipanah, Farideh [1 ]
Sadighpour, Leyla [1 ]
Payaminia, Leila [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Fac Dent, Dent Implant Res Ctr, Dept Prosthodont, Tehran, Iran
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH | 2023年 / 9卷 / 06期
关键词
accuracy; arch size; digital impression; implant; MARGINAL FIT; SYSTEM; RESTORATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.793
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of arch size and implant angulation on the accuracy of digital impression in two intraoral scanners of Trios (3shape) and CEREC (Omnicam).Material and Methods: Four acrylic models each including six implants at sites 11, 12, 15, 17, 23, and 27 were used, including large with parallel implants, large with angled implants, small with parallel implants, and small with angled implants. After tightening the scan bodies, distance measurements were done using a coordinate measuring machine. Then, each model was scanned 10 times using each scanner. Trueness and precision measurements were finally computed.Results: The trueness values ranged from 20 to 260 mu m in CEREC Omnicam, and from 40 to 1030 mu m in Trios. The precision values ranged from 30 to 190 mu m in CEREC Omnicam, while from 50 to 770 mu m in Trios. The multivariate test analysis indicated that the measured distances via two scanners and different models show different behaviors. Pairwise interactions between these three variables were significant (p < .05). Pairwise interactions between these variables were also significant. (p < .0001).Conclusions: Arch width could affect the accuracy of digital impression; by rotating toward the second quadrant and end points of the scan, errors have increased. However, the angulation of the implants had no effect on the accuracy of digital impression. The CEREC Omnicam scanner showed higher accuracy (trueness and precision) compared to the Trios (3shape) one.
引用
收藏
页码:983 / 992
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Effects of Implant Angulation, Impression Material, and Variation in Arch Curvature Width on Implant Transfer Model Accuracy
    Akalin, Zerrin Fidan
    Ozkan, Yasemin Kulak
    Ekerim, Ahmet
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (01) : 149 - 157
  • [2] Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type
    Alikhasi, Marzieh
    Siadat, Hakime
    Nasirpour, Alireza
    Hasanzade, Mahya
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2018, 2018
  • [3] Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study
    Amin, Sarah
    Weber, Hans Peter
    Finkelman, Matthew
    El Rafie, Khaled
    Kudara, Yukio
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) : 1360 - 1367
  • [4] Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study
    Andriessen, Frank S.
    Riikens, David R.
    van der Meer, Wither J.
    Wismeijer, Daniell W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 111 (03) : 186 - 194
  • [5] Accuracy of Digital vs Conventional Implant Impression Approach: A Three-Dimensional Comparative In Vitro Analysis
    Basaki, Kinga
    Alkumru, Hasan
    De Souza, Grace
    Finer, Yoav
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (04) : 792 - 799
  • [6] Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients
    Boeddinghaus, Moritz
    Breloer, Eva Sabina
    Rehmann, Peter
    Woestmann, Bernd
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 19 (08) : 2027 - 2034
  • [7] In Vitro Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions: The Effect of Implant Angulation
    Chia, Vanessa A.
    Esguerra, Roxanna J.
    Teoh, Khim Hean
    Teo, Juin Wei
    Wong, Keng Mun
    Tan, Keson B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (02) : 313 - 321
  • [8] Impressions are changing Deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling
    Christensen, Gordon J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 140 (10) : 1301 - 1304
  • [9] In vitro assessment of the accuracy of digital impressions prepared using a single system for full-arch restorations on implants
    Ciocca, Leonardo
    Meneghello, Roberto
    Monaco, Carlo
    Savio, Gianpaolo
    Scheda, Lorenzo
    Gatto, Maria Rosaria
    Baldissara, Paolo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2018, 13 (07) : 1097 - 1108
  • [10] Intrasubject comparison of digital vs. conventional workflow for screw-retained single-implant crowns: Prosthodontic and patient-centered outcomes
    Delize, Vincent
    Bouhy, Alice
    Lambert, France
    Lamy, Marc
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (09) : 892 - 902