Statistical normalization methods in microbiome data with application to microbiome cancer research

被引:20
|
作者
Xia, Yinglin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 840 S Wood St,Room 734 CSB,MC716, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
Microbiome; normalization; 16S rRNA sequencing data; shotgun metagenomic sequencing data; microbiome cancer research; DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION ANALYSIS; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COMPOSITIONAL DATA; RNA-SEQ; DIVERSITY; HYPOTHESIS; MODELS; SOIL; AREA; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1080/19490976.2023.2244139
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Mounting evidence has shown that gut microbiome is associated with various cancers, including gastrointestinal (GI) tract and non-GI tract cancers. But microbiome data have unique characteristics and pose major challenges when using standard statistical methods causing results to be invalid or misleading. Thus, to analyze microbiome data, it not only needs appropriate statistical methods, but also requires microbiome data to be normalized prior to statistical analysis. Here, we first describe the unique characteristics of microbiome data and the challenges in analyzing them (Section 2). Then, we provide an overall review on the available normalization methods of 16S rRNA and shotgun metagenomic data along with examples of their applications in microbiome cancer research (Section 3). In Section 4, we comprehensively investigate how the normalization methods of 16S rRNA and shotgun metagenomic data are evaluated. Finally, we summarize and conclude with remarks on statistical normalization methods (Section 5). Altogether, this review aims to provide a broad and comprehensive view and remarks on the promises and challenges of the statistical normalization methods in microbiome data with microbiome cancer research examples.
引用
收藏
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Challenges for case-control studies with microbiome data
    Wijgert, Janneke H. van de
    Jespers, Vicky
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (05) : 336 - 341
  • [42] Methods for Improving Human Gut Microbiome Data by Reducing Variability through Sample Processing and Storage of Stool
    Gorzelak, Monika A.
    Gill, Sandeep K.
    Tasnim, Nishat
    Ahmadi-Vand, Zahra
    Jay, Michael
    Gibson, Deanna L.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [43] Testing for Mediation Effect with Application to Human Microbiome Data
    Zhang, Haixiang
    Chen, Jun
    Li, Zhigang
    Liu, Lei
    STATISTICS IN BIOSCIENCES, 2021, 13 (02) : 313 - 328
  • [44] Advancing microbiome research
    Marchesi, Julian R.
    IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 154 (04) : 535 - 536
  • [45] Toward Comprehensive Plant Microbiome Research
    Saikkonen, Kari
    Nissinen, Riitta
    Helander, Marjo
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 8
  • [46] Review of human hand microbiome research
    Edmonds-Wilson, Sarah L.
    Nurinova, Nilufar I.
    Zapka, Carrie A.
    Fierer, Noah
    Wilson, Michael
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 80 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [47] Advancing microbiome research
    Marchesi, Julian R.
    MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2018, 164 (08): : 1005 - 1006
  • [48] Application of Microbiome in Forensics
    Zhang, Jun
    Liu, Wenli
    Simayijiang, Halimureti
    Hu, Ping
    Yan, Jiangwei
    GENOMICS PROTEOMICS & BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 21 (01) : 97 - 107
  • [49] Insights into microbiome research 1: How to choose appropriate controls for a microbiome study in MS?
    Baranzini, Sergio E.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (10) : 1278 - 1279
  • [50] Current Trends and Challenges of Microbiome Research in Bladder Cancer
    Isali, Ilaha
    Helstrom, Emma K.
    Uzzo, Nicole
    Lakshmanan, Ankita
    Nandwana, Devika
    Valentine, Henkel
    Sindhani, Mohit
    Abbosh, Philip
    Bukavina, Laura
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 26 (03) : 292 - 298