Effect of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy on the incidence of surgical-site wound infection: A meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
Kong, De-Shuai [1 ]
Zhang, Heng-Le [2 ]
Zhao, Xiu-Lei [1 ]
Meng, Yu [1 ]
Chai, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Zhen-Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Cangzhou Cent Hosp, Dept Biliary pancreat Surg 1, Cangzhou 061000, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Med Univ, Grad Sch, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
laparoscopic; pancreaticoduodenectomy; robotic; surgical-site wound infection; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/iwj.14259
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the impact of robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomies on postoperative surgical site wound infections. A comprehensive computerised search of databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang Data, was performed to identify studies comparing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with laparoscopicPD. Relevant studies were searched from the inception of the database construction until April 2023. The meta-analysis outcomes were analysed using odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The RevMan 5.4 software was used for the meta-analysis. The findings of the meta-analysis showed that patients who underwent laparoscopic PD had a significantly lower incidence of surgical-site wound (16.52% vs. 18.92%, OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.90, P = .0005), superficial wound (3.65% vs. 7.57%, OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.39-0.68, P < .001), and deep wound infections (1.09% vs. 2.23%, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34-0.85, P = .008) than those who received robotic PD. However, because of variations in sample size between studies, some studies suffered from methodological quality deficiencies. Therefore, further validation of this result is needed in future studies with higher quality and larger sample sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:3682 / 3689
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   Which method of distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery? [J].
Rodriguez, Maylis ;
Memeo, Riccardo ;
Leon, Piera ;
Panaro, Fabrizio ;
Tzedakis, Stylianos ;
Perotto, Ornella ;
Varatharajah, Sharmini ;
de'Angelis, Nicola ;
Riva, Pietro ;
Mutter, Didier ;
Navarro, Francis ;
Marescaux, Jacques ;
Pessaux, Patrick .
HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2018, 7 (05) :345-352
[22]   Mortality and postoperative complications after different types of surgical reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomya systematic review with meta-analysis [J].
Schorn, Stephan ;
Demir, Ihsan Ekin ;
Vogel, Thomas ;
Schirren, Rebekka ;
Reim, Daniel ;
Wilhelm, Dirk ;
Friess, Helmut ;
Ceyhan, Gueralp Onur .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2019, 404 (02) :141-157
[23]   Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Shyr, Bor-Uei ;
Chen, Shih-Chin ;
Shyr, Yi-Ming ;
Wang, Shin-E. .
MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (45)
[24]   Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Simon, Robert .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 101 (05) :865-874
[25]   Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses [J].
Stang, Andreas .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 25 (09) :603-605
[26]  
Tang Y., 2023, CHIN J ROBOTIC SURG, V4, P85
[27]  
[涂广平 Tu Guangping], 2020, [中国普通外科杂志, Chinese Journal of General Surgery], V29, P268
[28]  
Tyutyunnik P., 2022, SURG ENDOSC, V1-12
[29]   Risk factors for complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A NSQIP analysis with propensity score matching [J].
Vining, Charles C. ;
Kuchta, Kristine ;
Schuitevoerder, Darryl ;
Paterakos, Pierce ;
Berger, Yaniv ;
Roggin, Kevin K. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Hogg, Melissa E. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 122 (02) :183-194
[30]   Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: The Results of a Case-Matched Analysis from a Tertiary Care Center [J].
Vito Marino, Marco ;
Mirabella, Antonello ;
Gomez Ruiz, Marcos ;
Komorowski, Andrzej Lech .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 37 (03) :229-239