Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge for methane production: Evaluation of optimum ratio, microbial analysis, and kinetic modeling

被引:2
|
作者
Jhunjhunwala, Uday [1 ]
Padhi, Susant Kumar [1 ]
Pattanaik, Lopa [2 ]
Sharma, Dhruv [1 ]
Kumar, Abhishek [1 ]
Chaudhary, Pallavi [1 ]
Saxena, Vikalp [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiv Nadar Inst Eminence Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Greater Noida 201314, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] NIIT Univ, Dept Biotechnol & Bioinformat, Neemrana 301705, Rajasthan, India
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Food waste; Waste activated sludge; Optimum ratio; Methane; Kinetic model; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; ORGANIC WASTES; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; PRETREATMENT; BIOMASS; STRAW; ENHANCEMENT; HYDROLYSIS; STABILITY; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1007/s13399-023-04339-x
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the anaerobic co-digestion of food waste (FW) and waste activated sludge (WAS) in batch reactors (R1-R4) to determine the optimum ratio using the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test. A food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio of similar to 2 was maintained in each reactor, and the result indicated that FW to WAS ratio of 50:50% in R1 was optimum, with the highest cumulative methane production of 5916 mL observed over 32 days. The cumulative methane production follows the order of R1 > R2 > R3 > R4, which is correlated with the reduction of volatile solid (VS) and soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD). The digestate sludge from R1 after methane production shows its potential for use as a biofertilizer based on the acceptable C/N ratio (13.25). In addition, the liquid digestate generated is rich in carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, making this a valuable source of liquid fertilizer. Microbial community analysis using 16S rRNA sequencing in R1 showed the dominance of Firmicutes at the phylum level and Lactobacillus at the genus level in anaerobic co-digestion. The cumulative methane production in various reactors was validated using different kinetic models based on co-efficient of determination (R-2). The Logistic Function model gives a best fit for R1 (R-2 = 0.9915 and methane potential = 5964 mL), whereas the Fitzhugh model gives a good agreement for R2 (R-2 = 0.9885 and methane potential = 3280 mL), R3 (R-2 = 0.9812 and methane potential = 1442 mL), and R4 (R-2 = 0.9721 and methane potential = 1177 mL). The finding of this study would help to scale-up the co-digestion of FW and WAS at an optimum ratio for methane production.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Anaerobic Co-digestion of the Liquid Fraction of Food Waste with Waste Activated Sludge
    Kanellos, Gerasimos
    Tremouli, Asimina
    Kondylis, Antonios
    Stamelou, Antigoni
    Lyberatos, Gerasimos
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2024, 15 (06) : 3339 - 3350
  • [12] Anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and cardboard waste: Focusing on methane production, microbial community analysis and energy evaluation
    Zhao, Shunan
    Chen, Wenhan
    Luo, Wendan
    Fang, Hongli
    Lv, Huanyu
    Liu, Rutao
    Niu, Qigui
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 321
  • [13] Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with pretreated yard waste: A comparative study of methane production, kinetic modeling and energy balance
    Panigrahi, Sagarika
    Sharma, Hari Bhakta
    Dubey, Brajesh K.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 243
  • [14] Synergistic methane production from the anaerobic co-digestion of Spirulina platensis with food waste and sewage sludge at high solid concentrations
    Du, Xinrui
    Tao, Yi
    Li, Huan
    Liu, Yueling
    Feng, Kai
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 142 : 55 - 61
  • [15] Effects of temperature and organic loading rate on the performance and microbial community of anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and food waste
    Gou, Chengliu
    Yang, Zhaohui
    Huang, Jing
    Wang, Huiling
    Xu, Haiyin
    Wang, Like
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2014, 105 : 146 - 151
  • [16] Anaerobic co-digestion of condensate produced from drying of Household Food Waste and Waste Activated Sludge
    Lytras, G.
    Koutroumanou, E.
    Lyberatos, G.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (04):
  • [17] Deciphering pathogens inactivation mechanism during anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge: The role of pH
    Tang, Rui
    Zhang, Qi
    Chen, Yong-Dong
    Bai, Wen-Jing
    Xu, Jiao-Jiao
    Pang, Yilin
    An, Ying
    Zhou, Zhen
    Hu, Zhen-Hu
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 498
  • [18] Anaerobic Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste and Cattle Manure for Methane Production
    Li, R.
    Chen, S.
    Li, X.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2009, 31 (20) : 1848 - 1856
  • [19] Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and Egeria densa: Performance assessment and kinetic analysis
    Zhen, Guangyin
    Lu, Xueqin
    Kobayashi, Takuro
    Li, Yu-You
    Xu, Kaiqin
    Zhao, Youcai
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 148 : 78 - 86
  • [20] Influence of Sludge Retention Time on the Performance and Stability of Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste with Waste Activated Sludge
    Yuan H.-L.
    Ma J.
    Xing B.-S.
    Wen J.-W.
    Han Y.-L.
    Li Q.
    Wang X.-C.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2019, 40 (02): : 994 - 1002