Mechanical Assist Device-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Use of Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as an Emerging Frontier in Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock

被引:6
作者
Vora, Neel [1 ]
Chaudhary, Rajvi [1 ]
Upadhyay, Hetarth Vivek [1 ]
Konat, Ashwati [2 ]
Zalavadia, Parit [3 ]
Padaniya, Arif [1 ]
Patel, Parth [4 ]
Patel, Nihar [1 ]
Prajjwal, Priyadarshi [5 ]
Sharma, Kamal [6 ]
机构
[1] BJ Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Ahmadabad, India
[2] Gujarat Univ, Dept Zool Biomed Technol & Human Genet, Ahmadabad, India
[3] GCS Gujarat Canc Soc Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Ahmadabad, India
[4] Pramukhswami Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Karamsad, India
[5] Bharati Vidyapeeth Univ Med Coll, Dept Med, Pune, India
[6] UN Mehta Inst Cardiol & Res Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Ahmadabad, India
关键词
ventricular assist devices; cardiogenic shock; revascularization; ecmo; impella; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; CANNULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEASIBILITY; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.33372
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) procedure aids in the provision of prolonged cardiopulmonary support, whereas the Impella device (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a ventricular assist device that maintains circulation by pumping blood into the aorta from the left ventricle. Blood is circulated in parallel with the heart by Impella. It draws blood straight into the aorta from the left ventricle, hence preserving the physiological flow. ECMO bypasses the left atrium and the left ventricle, and the end consequence is a non-physiological flow. In this article, we conducted a detailed analysis of various publications in the literature and examined various modalities pertaining to the use of ECMO and Impella for cardiogenic shocks, such as efficacy, clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, device-related complications, and limitations. The Impella completely unloads the left ventricle, thereby significantly reducing the effort of the heart. Comparatively, ECMO only stabilizes a patient with cardiogenic shock for a short stretch of time and does not lessen the efforts of the left ventricle ("unload" it). In the acute setting, both devices reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and provided adequate hemodynamic support. By comparing patients on Impella to those receiving ECMO, it was found that patients on Impella were associated with better clinical results, quicker recovery, limited complications, and reduced healthcare costs; however, there is a lack of conclusive studies performed demonstrating the reduction in long-term mortality rates. Considering the effectiveness of given modalities and taking into account the various studies described in the literature, Impella has reported better clinical outcomes although more clinical trials are needed for establishing the effectiveness of these interventional approaches in revascularization in cardiogenic shock.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 98 条
[11]   Meta-Analysis of Usefulness of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions [J].
Briasoulis, Alexandros ;
Telila, Tesfaye ;
Palla, Mohan ;
Mercado, Nestor ;
Kondur, Ashok ;
Grines, Cindy ;
Schreiber, Theodore .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 118 (03) :369-375
[12]   Nosocomial infections in adult patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [J].
Burket, JS ;
Bartlett, RH ;
vander Hyde, K ;
Chenoweth, CE .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 28 (04) :828-833
[13]   Hemodynamics of Mechanical Circulatory Support [J].
Burkhoff, Daniel ;
Sayer, Gabriel ;
Doshi, Darshan ;
Uriel, Nir .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (23) :2664-2674
[14]   Impella: pumps overview and access site management [J].
Burzotta, Francesco ;
Russo, Giulio ;
Previ, Leonardo ;
Bruno, Piergiorgio ;
Aurigemma, Cristina ;
Trani, Carlo .
MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2018, 66 (05) :606-611
[15]   CURRENT CONCEPTS - CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK [J].
CALIFF, RM ;
BENGTSON, JR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (24) :1724-1730
[16]   Complications of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-Analysis of 1,866 Adult Patients [J].
Cheng, Richard ;
Hachamovitch, Rory ;
Kittleson, Michelle ;
Patel, Jignesh ;
Arabia, Francisco ;
Moriguchi, Jaime ;
Esmailian, Fardad ;
Azarbal, Babak .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 97 (02) :610-616
[17]   Percutaneous versus surgical femoro-femoral veno-arterial ECMO: a propensity score matched study [J].
Danial, Pichoy ;
Hajage, David ;
Nguyen, Lee S. ;
Mastroianni, Ciro ;
Demondion, Pierre ;
Schmidt, Matthieu ;
Bougle, Adrien ;
Amour, Julien ;
Leprince, Pascal ;
Combes, Alain ;
Lebreton, Guillaume .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 44 (12) :2153-2161
[18]   Budget Impact Analysis of Impella CP® Utilization in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock in France: A Health Economic Analysis [J].
Delmas, Clement ;
Pernot, Mathieu ;
Le Guyader, Alexandre ;
Joret, Romain ;
Roze, Stephane ;
Lebreton, Guillaume .
ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2022, 39 (03) :1293-1309
[19]   Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock Patients with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use: A Matched Cohort Study in Hospitals across the United States [J].
El Sibai, Rayan ;
Bachir, Rana ;
El Sayed, Mazen .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
[20]   Increased Plasma-Free Hemoglobin Levels Identify Hemolysis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and a Trans valvular Micro-Axial Flow Pump [J].
Esposito, Michele L. ;
Morine, Kevin J. ;
Annamalai, Shiva K. ;
O'Kelly, Ryan ;
Aghili, Nima ;
Pedicini, Robert ;
Breton, Catalina ;
Mullin, Andrew ;
Hamadeh, Anas ;
Kiernan, Michael S. ;
DeNofrio, David ;
Kapur, Navin K. .
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2019, 43 (02) :125-131