Mechanical Assist Device-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Use of Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as an Emerging Frontier in Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock

被引:6
作者
Vora, Neel [1 ]
Chaudhary, Rajvi [1 ]
Upadhyay, Hetarth Vivek [1 ]
Konat, Ashwati [2 ]
Zalavadia, Parit [3 ]
Padaniya, Arif [1 ]
Patel, Parth [4 ]
Patel, Nihar [1 ]
Prajjwal, Priyadarshi [5 ]
Sharma, Kamal [6 ]
机构
[1] BJ Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Ahmadabad, India
[2] Gujarat Univ, Dept Zool Biomed Technol & Human Genet, Ahmadabad, India
[3] GCS Gujarat Canc Soc Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Ahmadabad, India
[4] Pramukhswami Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Karamsad, India
[5] Bharati Vidyapeeth Univ Med Coll, Dept Med, Pune, India
[6] UN Mehta Inst Cardiol & Res Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Ahmadabad, India
关键词
ventricular assist devices; cardiogenic shock; revascularization; ecmo; impella; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS; RISK-FACTORS; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; CANNULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEASIBILITY; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.33372
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) procedure aids in the provision of prolonged cardiopulmonary support, whereas the Impella device (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a ventricular assist device that maintains circulation by pumping blood into the aorta from the left ventricle. Blood is circulated in parallel with the heart by Impella. It draws blood straight into the aorta from the left ventricle, hence preserving the physiological flow. ECMO bypasses the left atrium and the left ventricle, and the end consequence is a non-physiological flow. In this article, we conducted a detailed analysis of various publications in the literature and examined various modalities pertaining to the use of ECMO and Impella for cardiogenic shocks, such as efficacy, clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, device-related complications, and limitations. The Impella completely unloads the left ventricle, thereby significantly reducing the effort of the heart. Comparatively, ECMO only stabilizes a patient with cardiogenic shock for a short stretch of time and does not lessen the efforts of the left ventricle ("unload" it). In the acute setting, both devices reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and provided adequate hemodynamic support. By comparing patients on Impella to those receiving ECMO, it was found that patients on Impella were associated with better clinical results, quicker recovery, limited complications, and reduced healthcare costs; however, there is a lack of conclusive studies performed demonstrating the reduction in long-term mortality rates. Considering the effectiveness of given modalities and taking into account the various studies described in the literature, Impella has reported better clinical outcomes although more clinical trials are needed for establishing the effectiveness of these interventional approaches in revascularization in cardiogenic shock.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
Alpard Scott K, 2002, Chest Surg Clin N Am, V12, P355, DOI 10.1016/S1052-3359(02)00002-9
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, ICR J ICR3, V17
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Businesswire
[4]   Procedural and clinical outcomes after catheter ablation of unstable ventricular tachycardia supported by a percutaneous left ventricular assist device [J].
Aryana, Arash ;
O'Neill, P. Gearoid ;
Gregory, David ;
Scotti, Dennis ;
Bailey, Sean ;
Brunton, Scott ;
Chang, Michael ;
d'Avila, Andre .
HEART RHYTHM, 2014, 11 (07) :1122-1130
[5]   Infections Acquired by Adults Who Receive Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Risk Factors and Outcome [J].
Aubron, Cecile ;
Cheng, Allen C. ;
Pilcher, David ;
Leong, Tim ;
Magrin, Geoff ;
Cooper, D. Jamie ;
Scheinkestel, Carlos ;
Pellegrino, Vince .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (01) :24-30
[6]   Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative [J].
Basir, Mir B. ;
Schreiber, Theodore ;
Dixon, Simon ;
Alaswad, Khaldoon ;
Patel, Kirit ;
Almany, Steven ;
Khandelwal, Akshay ;
Hanson, Ivan ;
George, Augustine ;
Ashbrook, Michael ;
Blank, Nimrod ;
Abdelsalam, Murad ;
Sareen, Nishtha ;
Timmis, Steven B. H. ;
O'Neill, William W. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 91 (03) :454-461
[7]   Effect of Early Initiation of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Survival in Cardiogenic Shock [J].
Basir, Mir B. ;
Schreiber, Theodore L. ;
Grines, Cindy L. ;
Dixon, Simon R. ;
Moses, Jeffrey W. ;
Maini, Brijeshwar S. ;
Khandelwal, Akshay K. ;
Ohman, E. Magnus ;
O'Neill, William W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (06) :845-851
[8]   Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in New York State Trends, Outcomes, and Implications for Patient Selection [J].
Batra, Jaya ;
Toyoda, Nana ;
Goldstone, Andrew B. ;
Itagaki, Shinobu ;
Egorova, Natalia N. ;
Chikwe, Joanna .
CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2016, 9 (12)
[9]   Infections during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis and prevention [J].
Biffi, Stefano ;
Di Bella, Stefano ;
Scaravilli, Vittorio ;
Peri, Anna Maria ;
Grasselli, Giacomo ;
Alagna, Laura ;
Pesenti, Antonio ;
Gori, Andrea .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2017, 50 (01) :9-16
[10]   Mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock in intensive care units: A position paper of the "Unite de Soins Intensifs de Cardiologie" group of the French Society of Cardiology, endorsed by the "Groupe Atherome et Cardiologie Interventionnelle" of the French Society of Cardiology [J].
Bonello, Laurent ;
Delmas, Clement ;
Schurtz, Guillaume ;
Leurent, Guillaume ;
Bonnefoy, Eric ;
Aissaoui, Nadia ;
Henry, Patrick .
ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2018, 111 (10) :601-612