Patient Engagement in Research: Considerations in Creating a Registry for Adults with Congenital Heart Disease

被引:4
作者
Phillippi, Ruth [1 ]
Leezer, Scott [2 ]
Messmer, Mindi [1 ]
Hile, Danielle [3 ]
John, Anitha S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Natl Hlth Syst, Div Pediat Cardiol, 111 Michigan Ave,3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] CURA Strategies, Washington, DC USA
[3] Adult Congenital Heart Assoc, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Patient engagement; Registry; Congenital heart disease; CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH; CLINICAL-RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-023-02013-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of ReviewPatient engagement is defined as the meaningful involvement and active partnership of patients and key partners throughout the entire research project. This article reviews the importance of developing a patient engagement plan to promote better alignment of research with patients' and clinicians' real-world needs and concerns.Recent FindingsThe Congenital Heart Initiative (CHI) launched in 2020 is an entirely web-based longitudinal registry designed in close coordination with the adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) community it is intended to serve. Successful community engagement has resulted in real-world data being collected in large scale in a rare disease population.SummaryEstablishing patient engagement plans is critical to conducting patient-centered outcomes research. Continued improvement of community engagement strategies is needed to ensure the entire ACHD population is represented to facilitate future research and improved clinical care.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 21
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates [J].
Abshire, Martha ;
Dinglas, Victor D. ;
Cajita, Maan Isabella A. ;
Eakin, Michelle N. ;
Needham, Dale M. ;
Himmelfarb, Cheryl Dennison .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
[2]  
[Anonymous], ENGAGEMENT RUBRIC AP
[3]  
[Anonymous], FDA ANNOUNCES 1 EVER
[4]  
[Anonymous], PCORI engagement rubric
[5]  
Barello S., 2014, J Particip Med, V6, P1
[6]   Operational and Ethical Considerations for a National Adult Congenital Heart Disease Database [J].
Bradley, Elisa A. ;
Khan, Abigail ;
McNeal, Demetria M. ;
Bravo-Jaimes, Katia ;
Khanna, Amber ;
Cook, Stephen ;
Opotowsky, Alexander R. ;
John, Anitha ;
Lee, Marc ;
Pasquali, Sara ;
Daniels, Curt J. ;
Pernick, Michael ;
Kirkpatrick, James N. ;
Gurvitz, Michelle .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2022, 11 (07)
[7]   The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years [J].
Cella, David ;
Yount, Susan ;
Rothrock, Nan ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Cook, Karon ;
Reeve, Bryce ;
Ader, Deborah ;
Fries, James F. ;
Bruce, Bonnie ;
Rose, Mattias .
MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) :S3-S11
[8]   The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: A systematic review [J].
Fergusson D. ;
Monfaredi Z. ;
Pussegoda K. ;
Garritty C. ;
Lyddiatt A. ;
Shea B. ;
Duffett L. ;
Ghannad M. ;
Montroy J. ;
Murad M.H. ;
Pratt M. ;
Rader T. ;
Shorr R. ;
Yazdi F. .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 4 (1)
[9]   Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute [J].
Forsythe, Laura P. ;
Carman, Kristin L. ;
Szydlowski, Victoria ;
Fayish, Lauren ;
Davidson, Laurie ;
Hickam, David H. ;
Hall, Courtney ;
Bhat, Geeta ;
Neu, Denese ;
Stewart, Lisa ;
Jalowsky, Maggie ;
Aronson, Naomi ;
Anyanwu, Chinenye Ursla .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (03) :359-367
[10]   What Patients Prioritize for Research to Improve Their Lives and How Their Priorities Get Dismissed again [J].
Groot, Barbara ;
Haveman, Annyk ;
Buree, Mireille ;
van Zuijlen, Ruud ;
van Zuijlen, Juliette ;
Abma, Tinekez .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (04)