Evaluation of Future-Integrated Urban Water Management Using a Risk and Decision Analysis Framework: A Case Study in Denver-Colorado Metro Area (DCMA)

被引:5
作者
He, Bowen [1 ]
Zheng, Han [2 ]
Guan, Qun [3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, PMB 351831,2301 Vanderbilt Pl, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Hefei Univ Technol Design Inst Grp Co Ltd, Hefei 230071, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei Univ Technol, Coll Civil Engn, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
基金
安徽省自然科学基金;
关键词
water supply and demand; risk analysis; decision analysis; climate change; multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA); Denver-Colorado Metro Area (DCMA);
D O I
10.3390/w15224020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examines the DCMA concerning the future risk of the water security status. We considered three risk factors: population growth, economic growth, and natural water supply-demand differences. In the risk analysis part, we consulted with experts from several sectors including academia, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), and industry, to predict that the probability of future water stresses in high-, medium-, and low-risk scenarios are 0.73, 0.24, and 0.03, respectively. In the decision analysis part, we adopted two multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approaches that include multiple attribute value theory (MAVT) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methods to evaluate the best alternative decision to alleviate future water stresses in the DCMA. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates that, although expanding existing water reservation might be a solution to tackle the challenge, the best option really closely connects to the weighting scheme of the criteria considered in the framework. This study provides a valuable risk and decision analysis framework to analyze the water security status associated with the future water supply and demand gap decrease caused by three risk factors: population growth, climate change, and natural water supply.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework [J].
Angelis, Aris ;
Kanavos, Panos .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 188 :137-156
[2]  
[Anonymous], Colorado Water Plan
[3]  
Aurora Water Municipal Water Efficiency Plan Aurora Water City of Aurora Colorado, Aurora Water
[4]   A Novel AHP-PRISM Risk Assessment Method-An Empirical Case Study in a Nuclear Power Plant [J].
Bognar, Ferenc ;
Benedek, Petra .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (17)
[5]   Reassessing the projections of the World Water Development Report [J].
Boretti, Alberto ;
Rosa, Lorenzo .
NPJ CLEAN WATER, 2019, 2 (1)
[6]  
Choy I., Recharge: Groundwater's Second Act. Water in the West
[7]   The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin [J].
Christensen, NS ;
Wood, AW ;
Voisin, N ;
Lettenmaier, DP ;
Palmer, RN .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2004, 62 (1-3) :337-363
[8]   Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions [J].
Cosgrove, William J. ;
Loucks, Daniel P. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (06) :4823-4839
[9]  
Douglas County, About us
[10]  
He B., 2023, Ph.D. Thesis