Review of heating and cooling technologies for buildings: A techno-economic case study of eleven European countries

被引:30
作者
Mitterrutzner, Benjamin [1 ]
Callegher, Claudio Zandonella [1 ]
Fraboni, Riccardo [1 ]
Wilczynski, Eric [1 ]
Pezzutto, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] Eurac Res, Inst Renewable Energy, Viale Druso 1, I-39100 Bolzano, Italy
关键词
Buildings; Heating and cooling technologies; Energy efficiency; Techno-economic analysis; Data collection; Data analysis; ENERGY-SYSTEMS; NATURAL-GAS; MICRO-CHP; BIOMASS; SCALE; PUMPS; POWER; ELECTRICITY; EFFICIENCY; BOILERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.129252
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The present study develops a review of heating and cooling (H&C) technologies used to produce space H&C services in eleven European member states. On the one hand, it revises (a) technical parameters, e.g. energy efficiency, of various H&C technologies. On the other hand, it reflects the status-quo of (b) economic costs of these systems, and it exhibits a (c) short environmental impact assessment. Costs are differentiated between investment and operational costs. The H&C technology portfolio is subdivided into (i) end-use heating technologies, (ii) district heating (DH) technologies and (iii) cooling technologies. Based on the data analysis, the different H&C systems are compared among one another in terms of technical efficiency, capital and operational cost, and technical lifetime and age of the technology stock. Whilst the different heat pump (HP) systems excel in the average efficiency, natural gas boilers are the most efficient option among fossil fuel fired boilers. Furthermore, it is the cleanest of the fossil fuels. The environmental assessment exhibits the importance of renewable energy systems for a sustainable energy transition. HP systems and electric heaters are grid -dependent and the CO2 footprint depends on the carbon footprint of the specific country's electricity supply. Regarding the economic analysis, following is concluded: on average, the capital costs of end-use HPs and solar thermal collectors are around 1000 ke/MW, while biomass boilers cost slightly more. Both on a DH and end-use level, fossil fuel boilers are among the most cost-efficient options. District cooling systems are low-cost options compared to small granular air-conditioners. Furthermore, HP systems (which can provide heating and cooling attendances) are more cost-effective on a decentralised scale, meanwhile biomass boilers and combined heat and power (CHP) plants are more cost competitive on a large DH plant level. Current developments and challenges within the residential sector are identified and future research trends are summarised. Overall, the outcome is a simple, but unified review of heating and cooling technologies for Europe and a perspective for efficient pathways for this sector.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 126 条
[1]   How can combined heating and cooling networks benefit from thermal energy storage? Minimizing lifetime cost for different scenarios [J].
Ahmadisedigh, Hossein ;
Gosselin, Louis .
ENERGY, 2022, 243
[2]  
Ainger J., 2021, Forget Gas and Hydrogen. Your Next Boiler Should Be a Heat Pump
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Paris Agreement
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, District Heating
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, FUTURE COOLING OPPOR, DOI [10.1787/9789264301993-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264301993-EN]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, NET ZERO 2050 ROADMA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2021, SP 500 Energy
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2022, The Paris agreement
[9]  
Austrian Institute of Technology, 2020, Evolution of the Austrian district heating sector and the role of solar thermal energy: scenarios for 2030
[10]   Large heat pumps in Swedish district heating systems [J].
Averfalk, Helge ;
Ingvarsson, Paul ;
Persson, Urban ;
Gong, Mei ;
Werner, Sven .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 79 :1275-1284