Hugo's Moments, Maria's Everyday Chores? Discords in the Search for Grotian Moments for Women's Rights in International Law

This chapter would have liked to invite its readers on an exciting but breath-taking journey through the historical landscapes of international law, since `time immemorial' a male-centred and, until the 1990s, almost exclusively male intellectual tradition and professional practice - at least in the eyes of the currently dominating historiography. Helas, the ambition had to be downscaled into a few rapid zooms, touristic snapshots in an impressionistic mode, on seven contexts in time and space in a hasty timeline from the eighteenth century to 2021. They reflect, merely as examples, women's status in international law in diverse political, social and legal transformations or crisis. Some are representing moments of codification or the break-through of certain interpretations of women's rights. Others are selected for their role in enabling women's participation in decision-making or entry to international legal positions, or because they provide an example of women's international activism for women's rights. All of them might have preceded, followed, or in fact themselves constituted `Grotian Moments' for `women's rights' - did they, and if not, why? Should they have? If yes, which ones and how, to what effect for `women'?