Epistemological assumptions of age-friendly cities: a scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Maciel, Tatiana Frade [1 ]
Moura, Leides Barroso Azevedo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
Ageism; Intersectional framework; Ageing; Aged; Healthy city; Social inclusion; Independent living; OLDER-ADULTS; RURAL COMMUNITIES; LIFE SATISFACTION; PUBLIC-HEALTH; IN-PLACE; URBAN; INITIATIVES; PARTICIPATION; ENVIRONMENTS; GERONTOLOGY;
D O I
10.37689/acta-ape/2023AR002022
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify the concepts and theoretical perspectives that underlie studies on age-friendly city.Methods: This is a scoping review using six databases to identify studies published in indexed journals between 2007 and 2021 using the keywords 'age-friendly' OR 'age friendly' OR 'cidade amiga'. Results: A total of 2,975 studies were found, which, after applying the exclusion criteria, resulted in 227. There was wide variation in the concept of the term, but many authors did so by replicating the WHO, and in 59.5% of studies there was no mention of any theoretical perspective. The ecological theory was the most frequent reference (26%), the term being used as an equivalent to active aging. Authors from four countries account for most articles (61%).Conclusion: It is necessary to articulate the concept of age-friendly city with a theoretical and cultural approach to understand more deeply the urban and social perspectives under the logic of population aging, mainly for Latin America. Theoretical analysis in these studies and in gerontology will favor more critical discussions about aging, ageism and the growing social inequality in progress.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Smart Age-Friendly Environments
    Kavsek, Marta
    Rogelj, Valerija
    Bogataj, David
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (13): : 768 - 773
  • [42] What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature
    Lui, Chi-Wai
    Everingham, Jo-Anne
    Warburton, Jeni
    Cuthill, Michael
    Bartlett, Helen
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2009, 28 (03) : 116 - 121
  • [43] Analysis of Age-Friendly Cancer Care Readiness
    Lynch, Mary Pat
    Kagan, Sarah H.
    Thomas, Teresa Hagan
    Fennimore, Laura
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2021, 48 (03) : 333 - 340
  • [44] Smart and Age-friendly Communities: A Review of Research, Policy and Literature
    Nedeljko, Mihael
    Bogataj, David
    Perovic, Barbara Toplak
    Kaucic, Boris Miha
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02): : 9546 - 9551
  • [45] A Review of Public Sector Engagement in Age-Friendly Community Initiatives
    Pope, Natalie E.
    Greenfield, Emily A.
    Keyes, Laura
    Russell, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2025, 37 (02) : 187 - 215
  • [46] Age-friendly healthcare: integrating the 4Ms to enable age-friendly cancer care
    Hodge, Oliver
    Rasekaba, Tshepo
    Blackberry, Irene
    Steer, Christopher B.
    CURRENT OPINION IN SUPPORTIVE AND PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 18 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [47] Measurement Indicators of Age-Friendly Communities: Findings From the AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey
    Kim, Kyeongmo
    Buckley, Tommy
    Burnette, Denise
    Kim, Seon
    Cho, Sunghwan
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2022, 62 (01) : E17 - E27
  • [48] Transdisciplinary forward-looking agenda setting for age-friendly, human centered cities
    Gudowsky, Niklas
    Sotoudeh, Mahshid
    Capari, Leo
    Wilfing, Harald
    FUTURES, 2017, 90 : 16 - 30
  • [49] Developing Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: Eleven Case Studies from around the World
    Remillard-Boilard, Samuele
    Buffel, Tine
    Phillipson, Chris
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [50] Cross-National Perspectives on Aging and Place: Implications for Age-Friendly Cities and Communities
    Woolrych, Ryan
    Sixsmith, Judith
    Duvvuru, Jamuna
    Portella, Adriana
    Fang, Mei Lan
    Menezes, Deborah
    Henderson, James
    Fisher, Jenny
    Lawthom, Rebecca
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2022, 62 (01) : 119 - 129