Robotic colorectal surgery in the emergent diverticulitis setting: is it safe? A review of large national database

被引:10
|
作者
Curfman, Karleigh R. R. [1 ]
Jones, Ian F. F. [2 ]
Conner, Jeffrey R. R. [2 ]
Neighorn, Christopher C. C. [3 ]
Wilson, Ryan K. K. [3 ]
Rashidi, Laila [1 ]
机构
[1] MultiCare Hlth Network, Tacoma, WA 98405 USA
[2] Madigan Army Med Ctr, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
[3] Intuit Surg, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Diverticulitis; Colectomy; Emergency surgery;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04436-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAs robotic colorectal surgery continues to advance in conjunction with improved recovery protocols, we began implementing robotic surgery (RS) as an option for emergent diverticulitis surgery. Our hospital system utilizes the Da Vinci Xi system, and staff are required to undergo training, making emergent colorectal surgery a feasible option. However, it is essential to determine the safety with reproducibility of our experiences.MethodsA de-identified retrospective review was performed of Intuitive's national database which obtained data from 262 facilities from January 2018 through December 2021. This identified over 22,000 emergent colorectal surgeries. Of those, over 2500 were performed for diverticulitis in which 126 were RS, 446 laparoscopic surgery (LS), and 1952 open surgery (OS). Clinical outcome metrics including conversion rates, anastomotic leaks, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, length of stay, mortality, and readmissions were obtained. The cohort was defined by patients who were seen in the emergency department (ED) with diverticulitis and proceeded to have a sigmoid colectomy within 24 h of ED arrival.ResultsRS was associated with increased operating time (RS 262, LS 207, OS 182 min), but data has shown many benefits of emergent RS compared to OS. We identified significant decreases in ICU admission rates (OS 19.0%, RS 9.5%, p = 0.01) and anastomotic leak rates (OS 4.4%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04), with borderline improvement in overall length of stay (OS 9.9, RS 8.9 days, p = 0.05). When compared with LS, RS showed many comparable results. However, RS witnessed a statistically significant improvement in anastomotic leak rates (LS 4.5%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04). Importantly, there was a striking difference in conversion rates to OS. LS converted over 28.7% of cases to OS, whereas RS only converted 7.9%, p = 0.000005.ConclusionGiven these findings, RS is another MIS tool that could be a safe and feasible option for the acute management of emergent diverticulitis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Fellowship training in robotic colorectal surgery within the current hospital setting: an achievable goal?
    Waters, Peadar S.
    Flynn, Julie
    Larach, Jose T.
    Fernando, Diharah
    Peacock, Oliver
    Foster, Jake D.
    Flood, Michael
    McCormick, Jacob J.
    Warrier, Satish K.
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (11) : 2337 - 2344
  • [22] How robotic platforms are revolutionizing colorectal surgery techniques: a comparative review
    Hussain, Mariam
    Jaffar-Karballai, Mona
    Kayali, Fatima
    Jubouri, Matti
    Surkhi, Abedalaziz Omar
    Bashir, Mohamad
    Murtada, Ali
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2025,
  • [23] Robotic surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: Review of the current literature
    Teo, Nan Zun
    Ngu, James Chi Yong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 15 (06): : 1040 - 1047
  • [24] Disparities in utilization of robotic surgery for colon cancer: an evaluation of the US National Cancer Database
    Horsey, Michael L.
    Lai, Debra
    Sparks, Andrew D.
    Herur-Raman, Aalap
    Borum, Marie
    Rao, Sanjana
    Ng, Matthew
    Obias, Vincent J.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (06) : 1299 - 1306
  • [25] Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery Compared with Laparoscopic and Open Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Chang Woo Kim
    Chang Hee Kim
    Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2014, 18 : 816 - 830
  • [26] Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery Compared with Laparoscopic and Open Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Kim, Chang Woo
    Kim, Chang Hee
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2014, 18 (04) : 816 - 830
  • [27] Disparities in utilization of robotic surgery for colon cancer: an evaluation of the U.S. National Cancer Database
    Michael L. Horsey
    Debra Lai
    Andrew D. Sparks
    Aalap Herur-Raman
    Marie Borum
    Sanjana Rao
    Matthew Ng
    Vincent J. Obias
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 1299 - 1306
  • [28] Factors contributing to the utilization of robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dana M. Hayden
    Kevin M. Korous
    Ellen Brooks
    Fa Tuuhetaufa
    Erin M. King-Mullins
    Abigail M. Martin
    Chassidy Grimes
    Charles R. Rogers
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 3306 - 3320
  • [29] Factors contributing to the utilization of robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hayden, Dana M.
    Korous, Kevin M.
    Brooks, Ellen
    Tuuhetaufa, Fa
    King-Mullins, Erin M.
    Martin, Abigail M.
    Grimes, Chassidy
    Rogers, Charles R.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (05): : 3306 - 3320
  • [30] Impact of Robotic Assistance on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Type II Endometrial Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis
    Lamiman, Kelly
    Silver, Michael
    Goncalves, Nicole
    Kim, Michael
    Alagkiozidis, Ioannis
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (14)