Robotic colorectal surgery in the emergent diverticulitis setting: is it safe? A review of large national database

被引:10
|
作者
Curfman, Karleigh R. R. [1 ]
Jones, Ian F. F. [2 ]
Conner, Jeffrey R. R. [2 ]
Neighorn, Christopher C. C. [3 ]
Wilson, Ryan K. K. [3 ]
Rashidi, Laila [1 ]
机构
[1] MultiCare Hlth Network, Tacoma, WA 98405 USA
[2] Madigan Army Med Ctr, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
[3] Intuit Surg, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
关键词
Robotic surgery; Diverticulitis; Colectomy; Emergency surgery;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04436-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAs robotic colorectal surgery continues to advance in conjunction with improved recovery protocols, we began implementing robotic surgery (RS) as an option for emergent diverticulitis surgery. Our hospital system utilizes the Da Vinci Xi system, and staff are required to undergo training, making emergent colorectal surgery a feasible option. However, it is essential to determine the safety with reproducibility of our experiences.MethodsA de-identified retrospective review was performed of Intuitive's national database which obtained data from 262 facilities from January 2018 through December 2021. This identified over 22,000 emergent colorectal surgeries. Of those, over 2500 were performed for diverticulitis in which 126 were RS, 446 laparoscopic surgery (LS), and 1952 open surgery (OS). Clinical outcome metrics including conversion rates, anastomotic leaks, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, length of stay, mortality, and readmissions were obtained. The cohort was defined by patients who were seen in the emergency department (ED) with diverticulitis and proceeded to have a sigmoid colectomy within 24 h of ED arrival.ResultsRS was associated with increased operating time (RS 262, LS 207, OS 182 min), but data has shown many benefits of emergent RS compared to OS. We identified significant decreases in ICU admission rates (OS 19.0%, RS 9.5%, p = 0.01) and anastomotic leak rates (OS 4.4%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04), with borderline improvement in overall length of stay (OS 9.9, RS 8.9 days, p = 0.05). When compared with LS, RS showed many comparable results. However, RS witnessed a statistically significant improvement in anastomotic leak rates (LS 4.5%, RS 0.8%, p = 0.04). Importantly, there was a striking difference in conversion rates to OS. LS converted over 28.7% of cases to OS, whereas RS only converted 7.9%, p = 0.000005.ConclusionGiven these findings, RS is another MIS tool that could be a safe and feasible option for the acute management of emergent diverticulitis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Robotic colorectal surgery in the emergent diverticulitis setting: is it safe? A review of large national database
    Karleigh R. Curfman
    Ian F. Jones
    Jeffrey R. Conner
    Christopher C. Neighorn
    Ryan K. Wilson
    Laila Rashidi
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [2] Is laparoscopic surgery safe for elderly patients with diverticulitis? A national database study
    Braschi, Caitlyn
    Liu, Jessica K.
    Moazzez, Ashkan
    Petrie, Beverley A.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 407 (08) : 3599 - 3606
  • [3] Is laparoscopic surgery safe for elderly patients with diverticulitis? A national database study
    Caitlyn Braschi
    Jessica K. Liu
    Ashkan Moazzez
    Beverley A. Petrie
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2022, 407 : 3599 - 3606
  • [4] Clinical outcomes of elective robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer utilizing a large national database
    Ahuja, Vanita
    Paredes, Lucero G.
    Leeds, Ira L.
    Perkal, Melissa F.
    King, Joseph T.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (09): : 7199 - 7205
  • [5] Clinical outcomes of elective robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer utilizing a large national database
    Vanita Ahuja
    Lucero G. Paredes
    Ira L. Leeds
    Melissa F. Perkal
    Joseph T. King
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 7199 - 7205
  • [6] Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery
    Mirnezami, A. H.
    Mirnezami, R.
    Venkatasubramaniam, A. K.
    Chandrakumaran, K.
    Cecil, T. D.
    Moran, B. J.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (11) : 1084 - 1093
  • [7] Introduction of Robotic Surgery into a Community Hospital Setting: A Prospective Comparison of Robotic and Open Colorectal Resection for Cancer
    Zawadzki, Marek
    Krzystek-Korpacka, Malgorzata
    Rzaca, Marek
    Czarnecki, Roman
    Obuszko, Zbigniew
    Witkiewicz, Wojciech
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 34 (06) : 489 - 494
  • [8] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for recurrent diverticulitis: experience in consecutive cases and a review of the literature
    Madhu Ragupathi
    Diego I. Ramos-Valadez
    Chirag B. Patel
    Eric M. Haas
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 199 - 206
  • [9] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for recurrent diverticulitis: experience in consecutive cases and a review of the literature
    Ragupathi, Madhu
    Ramos-Valadez, Diego I.
    Patel, Chirag B.
    Haas, Eric M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (01): : 199 - 206
  • [10] Predictors of mortality after emergent surgery for acute colonic diverticulitis: Analysis of National Surgical Quality Improvement Project data
    Ballian, Nikiforos
    Rajamanickam, Victoria
    Harms, Bruce A.
    Foley, Eugene F.
    Heise, Charles P.
    Greenberg, Caprice C.
    Kennedy, Gregory D.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2013, 74 (02) : 611 - 616