Developing a Methodology for Model Intercomparison and Its Application to Improve Simulated Streamflow by Land Surface Models

被引:1
|
作者
Tinumbang, Aulia Febianda Anwar [1 ]
Yorozu, Kazuaki [1 ]
Tachikawa, Yasuto [1 ]
Ichikawa, Yutaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
Streamflow; Runoff; Water budget; balance; Hydrologic models; Land surface model; Model comparison; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SCHEMES; PROJECT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1175/JHM-D-22-0183.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Runoff generated by land surface models (LSMs) is extensively used to predict future river discharge under global warming. However, the structural bias of LSMs, the precipitation bias of the climate model, and other factors could cause the runoff to be biased. A model intercomparison study can help understand LSM behavior. Traditional model inter-comparison can discover output variation and evaluate performance, but explaining the reason for the difference is chal-lenging. This study developed a novel method to identify the reasons for disparities and suggest improvements. Consequently, we investigated the impacts of model settings by adopting the settings of another model in one model until it can mimic similar features in its output. Hence, we developed a process called the "emulation model." We employed two LSMs [Simple Biosphere with Urban Canopy (SiBUC) and Meteorological Research Institute Simple Biosphere model (MRI-SiB)] in the Thai River basin. SiBUC produced a higher surface runoff than MRI-SiB, and the development of the MRI-SiB emulation revealed the cause of this variation. The differences in runoff characteristics affected streamflow esti-mation. For instance, the SiBUC peak discharge was faster and higher than observed in the dry year. Conversely, there was a tendency to underestimate the flow estimated by MRI-SiB runoff during the transition from dry to wet seasons. In-corporating other model settings can alleviate the shortcomings of each model. Overall, the proposed method can identify the strengths and weaknesses of a model and enhance the reproducibility of the hydrological characteristics of the observed discharge in the basin. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study aims to develop a new methodology for model intercomparison to iden-tify the reasons for model output variation. Understanding why models behave differently is important to enhancing the reliability of model prediction. Our findings guide what affects disparities in land surface model runoff-based streamflow estimation, which will help reduce the uncertainty of future flood and drought predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 833
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of a land surface model for simulating rainfall streamflow hydrograph: 2. Comparison with hydrological models
    Nasonova, O. N.
    WATER RESOURCES, 2011, 38 (03) : 274 - 283
  • [2] Application of a land surface model for simulating rainfall streamflow hydrograph: 2. Comparison with hydrological models
    O. N. Nasonova
    Water Resources, 2011, 38 : 274 - 283
  • [3] Application of a land surface model for simulating rainfall streamflow hydrograph: 1. Model calibration
    Nasonova, O. N.
    Gusev, E. M.
    Kovalev, E. E.
    WATER RESOURCES, 2011, 38 (02) : 155 - 168
  • [4] Application of a land surface model for simulating rainfall streamflow hydrograph: 1. Model calibration
    O. N. Nasonova
    E. M. Gusev
    E. E. Kovalev
    Water Resources, 2011, 38
  • [5] THE AMMA LAND SURFACE MODEL INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT (ALMIP)
    Boone, Aaron
    de Rosnay, Patricia
    Balsamo, Gianpaolo
    Beljaars, Anton
    Chopin, Franck
    Decharme, Bertrand
    Delire, Christine
    Ducharne, Agnes
    Gascoin, Simon
    Grippa, Manuela
    Guichard, Francoise
    Gusev, Yeugeniy
    Harris, Phil
    Jarlan, Lionel
    Kergoat, Laurent
    Mougin, Eric
    Nasonova, Olga
    Norgaard, Anette
    Orgeval, Tristan
    Ottle, Catherine
    Poccard-Leclercq, Isabelle
    Polcher, Jan
    Sandholt, Inge
    Saux-Picart, Stephane
    Taylor, Christopher
    Xue, Yongkang
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 90 (12) : 1865 - 1880
  • [6] Intercomparison of soil moisture memory in two land surface models
    Mahanama, SPP
    Koster, RD
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2003, 4 (06) : 1134 - 1146
  • [7] Developing Novel Robust Models to Improve the Accuracy of Daily Streamflow Modeling
    Mohammadi, Babak
    Ahmadi, Farshad
    Mehdizadeh, Saeid
    Guan, Yiqing
    Quoc Bao Pham
    Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh
    Doan Quang Tri
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2020, 34 (10) : 3387 - 3409
  • [8] Developing Novel Robust Models to Improve the Accuracy of Daily Streamflow Modeling
    Babak Mohammadi
    Farshad Ahmadi
    Saeid Mehdizadeh
    Yiqing Guan
    Quoc Bao Pham
    Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh
    Doan Quang Tri
    Water Resources Management, 2020, 34 : 3387 - 3409
  • [9] Intercomparison study of the land surface process model and the common land model for a prairie wetland in Florida
    Whitfield, B.
    Jacobs, J. M.
    Judge, J.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2006, 7 (06) : 1247 - 1258
  • [10] Verification and Intercomparison of Multimodel Simulated Land Surface Hydrological Datasets over the United States
    Fan, Yun
    van den Dool, Huug M.
    Wu, Wanru
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2011, 12 (04) : 531 - 555