The super-enhancer repertoire in porcine liver

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Yi [1 ]
Zhang, Jinbi [2 ]
Wang, Caixia [1 ]
Dai, Hongjian [1 ]
Du, Xing [1 ]
Li, Qifa [1 ]
Pan, Zengxiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[2] Jinling Inst Technol, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Nanjing 211169, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
C-EBP; CUT&Tag; porcine liver; stitched-enhancers; super-enhancers; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; EXPRESSION ANALYSIS; CELL IDENTITY; IDENTIFICATION; ANNOTATION; TOPHAT; GENE;
D O I
10.1093/jas/skad056
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Three markers including H3K27ac, H3K4me1, and C-EBP beta were used to access and compare the characteristics of promoters, typical enhancers, and SEs in the porcine liver. The results provided novel insight on the locational, sequential, and functional, differences of cis-elements. The transcriptional initiation of genes is inextricably bound with the functions of cis-regulatory sequences. The pig is one of the most important livestock species and an ideal animal model for biomedical studies. At the same time, the liver is a critical organ with diverse and complex metabolic functions. Here, we performed Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) coupled with high-throughput sequencing to profile the chromatin landscape of histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac), histone H3 lysine 4 monomethylation (H3K4me1), and CCAAT enhancer-binding protein beta (C-EBP beta) in the 70-d-old porcine liver, compared the different profiles among the three markers and their associated stitched-enhancers by stitching and sorting the peaks within 12.5 kb () and generated the porcine liver-specific super-enhancers (SEs) by the combination of three markers. Compared to typical enhancers (TEs) and other stitched-enhancers, liver-specific SEs showed a higher density of cis-motifs and SNPs, which may recruit more tissue-specific vital TFs. The expression profiles in fetal and 70-d-old pigs proved that a large proportion of SE-associated genes were up-regulated and were more related to hepatic metabolisms and detoxification pathways. Our results illustrated the difference and connection among promoter and enhancer markers, identified the features of liver SEs and their associated genes, and provided novel insight into cis-element identification, function, and liver transcriptional regulation. Lay Summary The cis-regulatory elements including promoters, enhancers, and newly identified super-enhancers (SEs), which were reported to function both promoter and enhancer capabilities, play critical roles in selective gene expression during development and disease. To reveal and compare the characteristics of these cis-elements in liver, we first performed a genome-wide profile of H3K27ac, H3K4me1, and C-EBP beta, then constructed their associated stitched-enhancers respectively. Porcine liver-specific SEs were generated by overlapping the three stitched-enhancers. The genomic and genic location, TF binding sites and SNP distribution patterns were compared among these cis-elements. We found that stitched-enhancers gather in regions with higher gene densities and locate closer to the transcription starting sites. Additionally, SEs showed higher density of TF binding sites and SNPs. To access the transcriptional consequences of liver SEs, we first analyzed the genes locationally associated with SEs. The KEGG results suggested that these genes are significantly involved in metabolisms, detoxification, and autophagy pathways. We also detected the liver gene expression profiles using RNA-seq and noticed that SE-associated genes are more likely to be up-regulated. Our results provided novel information on the identification, function, and transcriptional regulation of cis-elements in the liver.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cancer by super-enhancer
    Vaehaerautio, Anna
    Taipale, Jussi
    SCIENCE, 2014, 346 (6215) : 1291 - 1292
  • [2] SEA: a super-enhancer archive
    Wei, Yanjun
    Zhang, Shumei
    Shang, Shipeng
    Zhang, Bin
    Li, Song
    Wang, Xinyu
    Wang, Fang
    Su, Jianzhong
    Wu, Qiong
    Liu, Hongbo
    Zhang, Yan
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (D1) : D172 - D179
  • [3] Testing the super-enhancer concept
    Blobel, Gerd A.
    Higgs, Douglas R.
    Mitchell, Jennifer A.
    Notani, Dimple
    Young, Richard A.
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2021, 22 (12) : 749 - 755
  • [4] Testing the super-enhancer concept
    Gerd A. Blobel
    Douglas R. Higgs
    Jennifer A. Mitchell
    Dimple Notani
    Richard A. Young
    Nature Reviews Genetics, 2021, 22 : 749 - 755
  • [5] Enhancer and super-enhancer: Positive regulators in gene transcription
    Yanling Peng
    Yubo Zhang
    Animal Models and Experimental Medicine, 2018, 1 (03) : 169 - 179
  • [6] Phase Separation, Super-enhancer, and Cancer
    Yoshino, Seiko
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2024, 115 : 706 - 706
  • [7] Enhancer and super-enhancer landscape in polycystic kidney disease
    Lakhia, Ronak
    Mishra, Abheepsa
    Biggers, Laurence
    Malladi, Venkat
    Cobo-Stark, Patricia
    Hajarnis, Sachin
    Patel, Vishal
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 103 (01) : 87 - 99
  • [8] Super-enhancer Dynamics throughout Myogenesis
    Abdelkarim, Basma
    Perkins, Theodore
    ACM-BCB' 2017: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS, COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY,AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2017, : 580 - 580
  • [9] Super-enhancer omics in stem cell
    Ma, Hongying
    Qu, Jian
    Pang, Zicheng
    Luo, Jian
    Yan, Min
    Xu, Weixin
    Zhuang, Haihui
    Liu, Linxin
    Qu, Qiang
    MOLECULAR CANCER, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [10] Super-Enhancer Transcription Converges on AID
    Alinikula, Jukka
    Schatz, David G.
    CELL, 2014, 159 (07) : 1490 - 1492