The state-private hybrid forest policy in Myanmar: The impact of neoliberalism on the forestry sector after the 1990s

被引:3
作者
Paing, Win Min [1 ]
Han, Phyu Phyu [1 ]
Ota, Masahiko [2 ]
Fujiwara, Takahiro [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Bioresource & Bioenvironm Sci, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Nagasaki Univ, Fac Environm Sci, Nagasaki, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Fac Agr, Fukuoka, Japan
[4] 744 Motooka,Nishi Ku, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan
关键词
Socialism; Market economy; Political transition; Timber markets; Discourse; Political Ecology; COMMUNITY FORESTRY; POLITICAL ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; GOVERNANCE; PARTICIPATION; WATER; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102900
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Changes in political orders, institutional rearrangements, global geopolitics, and environmental discourses shape public policy. After the 1990s, Myanmar has shifted from a centralized state (socialism) to a more decentralized state (neoliberalism). This study investigates the influence of neoliberalism on Myanmar's political economy and forest policy after the1990s. To this end, we employ a political ecology approach integrating with Marxist's political economy theory. We divide transitional periods into the military period (1988-2010) and the demo-cratic transition period (2011-2020) and discuss how political economy change generated by "neo-liberalization" in Myanmar has affected the forest sector. Myanmar has focused on developing local timber markets, dominated by privately-owned sawmills and timber processing factories after the 1990s. During both periods, the country has made progress in promoting marketization, the role of the private sector, and dereg-ulation and voluntarism, in contrast with the internal timber industry under the so-called "Burmese Way of Socialism." A state-private hybrid forest policy has emerged from the integration of neoliberal market principles with the state's stronghold timber extraction based on the 19th-century German forest principles of the Myanmar Selection System (MSS). This phenomenon implies the necessity to review the MSS combined with the 1995 forest policy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, The Hedgehog Review
  • [2] Forests, discourses, institutions A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance
    Arts, Bas
    Buizer, Marleen
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 11 (5-6) : 340 - 347
  • [3] Aukland L, 2003, CLIM POLICY, V3, P123
  • [4] Bakker K., 2015, The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology
  • [5] Neoliberal nature, ecological fixes, and the pitfalls of comparative research
    Bakker, Karen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2009, 41 (08): : 1781 - 1787
  • [6] Bryant R. L., 1994, Forest & Conservation History, V38, P160, DOI 10.2307/3983602
  • [7] Bryant R.L., 2007, HIST NATURAL RESOURC
  • [8] Bryant R.L., 2002, POLITICS ENV SE ASIA, DOI [10.4324/9780203030172, DOI 10.4324/9780203030172]
  • [9] Bryant Raymond., 1997, 3 WORLD POLITICAL EC
  • [10] Bryant RaymondL., 1997, POLITICAL ECOLOGY FO