Organizational Resilience to Knowledge Loss in Biotechnology Research

被引:0
作者
Jain, Amit [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Coll Design & Engn, Ind Syst Engn & Management, Singapore 117576, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Strategy & Policy, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Organizations; Research and development; Productivity; Interference; Biotechnology; Resilience; Industries; Forgetting; hiring; innovation; knowledge; knowledge loss; learning curves; retroactive interference; turnover; EXPERIENCE; TURNOVER; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; WORKING;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2024.3365802
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, we examine organizational resilience to research and development (R&D) productivity losses following knowledge loss (aka "forgetting") using a long panel (1970-2007) of data on U.S. biotechnology research. In our model, knowledge and R&D productivity loss may occur through three mechanisms, scientist turnover, interference with knowledge retrieval, and scientist knowledge decay. Our model also proposes three means through which organizations may become resilient to the effects of knowledge loss on R&D productivity. First, managers may compensate for knowledge losses due to turnover by recruitment. Second, the effects of interference to knowledge retrieval due to the use of new technologies may be minimized if new technologies are introduced into organizations by members with little prior experience in using incumbent technologies or by scientists with little prior collaboration experience. Third, scientists may mitigate the effects of knowledge decay by relearning because the reacquisition of previously lost knowledge is easier than learning it was initially. Irrespective of their source, our results suggest that the agency plays a role in making an organization resist the negative effects of knowledge loss on its R&D productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:5627 / 5640
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Retrieval-induced forgetting in a social context: Do the same mechanisms underlie forgetting in speakers and listeners? [J].
Abel, Magdalena ;
Baeuml, Karl-Heinz T. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2020, 48 (01) :1-15
[2]   Social capital: Prospects for a new concept [J].
Adler, PS ;
Kwon, SW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2002, 27 (01) :17-40
[3]   Transactive memory system in new product development teams [J].
Akgün, AE ;
Byrne, JC ;
Keskin, H ;
Lynn, GS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2006, 53 (01) :95-111
[4]   Employee Voluntary and Involuntary Turnover and Organizational Performance: Revisiting the Hypothesis from Classical Public Administration [J].
An, Seung-Ho .
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 22 (03) :444-469
[5]   THE PERSISTENCE AND TRANSFER OF LEARNING IN INDUSTRIAL SETTINGS [J].
ARGOTE, L ;
BECKMAN, SL ;
EPPLE, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (02) :140-154
[6]  
ARGOTE L, 1999, ORG LEARNING CREATIN
[7]   Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances [J].
Baltagi, BH ;
Wu, PX .
ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 1999, 15 (06) :814-823
[8]   The Role of Innovation Ecosystems and Social Capital in Startup Survival [J].
Bandera, Cesar ;
Thomas, Ellen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2019, 66 (04) :542-551
[9]   What Is Resilience and How Can It Be Nurtured? A Systematic Review of Empirical Literature on Organizational Resilience [J].
Barasa, Edwine ;
Mbau, Rahab ;
Gilson, Lucy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 7 (06) :491-503
[10]   Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production [J].
Benkard, CL .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (04) :1034-1054