Fuelling contempt for police: explaining why procedural injustice and police ineffectiveness damage Muslims' trust in police

被引:1
作者
Ali, Mohammed M. [1 ]
Murphy, Kristina [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Alfred Deakin Inst Citizenship & Globalizat, Melbourne 3125, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Griffith Criminol Inst, Brisbane 4122, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Policing; emotion; trust; procedural justice; police effectiveness; Muslims; COMPLIANCE BEHAVIOR; EMOTION; JUSTICE; COMMUNITY; LEGITIMACY; DETERMINANTS; RESPONSES; TERROR; WAR;
D O I
10.1080/10439463.2024.2328160
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Research shows that discriminatory policing can erode public trust in police. Yet, little research has examined the role that contempt can play in explaining this relationship. Focusing on Muslims in Australia, we test whether procedural justice and police effectiveness are associated with enhanced trust in police across two policing contexts (general duties policing and counterterrorism policing), and whether Muslims' level of contempt for police mediates these relationships. Using survey data from 504 Muslims, we show that both procedural justice and police effectiveness are positively associated with Muslims' trust in the police and negatively associated with contempt across both policing contexts. We also find that contempt is negatively associated with trust in both policing contexts. Finally, our findings show that contempt partially mediates the relationship between procedural justice and trust and between police effectiveness and trust. These findings reinforce the need for police to draw on procedurally fair and effective service delivery when engaging with minority groups who report strained relations with police. Our findings also highlight the need for scholars to closely consider distinct emotions as an important theoretical mechanism linking discriminatory police treatment with public (dis)trust of police.
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 721
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Importance of Being Satisfied: A Longitudinal Exploration of Police Contact, Procedural Injustice, and Subsequent Delinquency
    Slocum, Lee Ann
    Ann Wiley, Stephanie
    Esbensen, Finn-Aage
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2016, 43 (01) : 7 - 26
  • [22] Corruption and Trust in Police: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Procedural Justice
    Nalla, Mahesh K.
    Nam, Yongjae
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2021, 65 (6-7) : 715 - 740
  • [23] An application of procedural justice to stakeholder perspectives: examining police legitimacy and public trust in police complaints systems
    Schulenberg, Jennifer L.
    Chenier, Allison
    Buffone, Sonya
    Wojciechowski, Christine
    POLICING & SOCIETY, 2017, 27 (07) : 779 - 796
  • [24] Promoting Muslims' Willingness to Report Terror Threats to Police: Testing Competing Theories of Procedural Justice
    Murphy, Kristina
    Cherney, Adrian
    Teston, Marcus
    JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2019, 36 (04) : 594 - 619
  • [25] Why Do People Trust the Police? A Case Study of Thailand
    Kulachai, Waiphot
    Cheurprakobkit, Sutham
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [26] Citizens' perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police
    Engel, RS
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, 2005, 42 (04) : 445 - 481
  • [27] Explaining Police Procedural Justice in a Democracy: An Expanded Internal-External Model
    Wang, Shun-Yung Kevin
    Sun, Ivan Y. Y.
    Wu, Yuning
    Chen, Fei-Lin
    POLICE QUARTERLY, 2024, 27 (01) : 3 - 30
  • [28] The effects of procedural injustice during police-citizen encounters: a factorial vignette study
    Reisig, Michael D.
    Mays, Ryan D.
    Telep, Cody W.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2018, 14 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [29] "You are first a migrant": The role of police procedural injustice and social identity among Nigerian immigrants in the United States
    Sarpong, Dennis
    Reisig, Michael D.
    CRIMINOLOGY & CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2024, 24 (03) : 531 - 549
  • [30] Why do Swedes Cooperate with the Police? A SEM Analysis of Tyler's Procedural Justice Model
    Van Damme, Anjuli
    Pauwels, Lieven
    Svensson, Robert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL ON CRIMINAL POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (01) : 15 - 33