The relevance of neo-institutionalism for organizational change

被引:1
作者
Hwang, Kwangseon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gachon Univ, Dept Publ Adm & Policy, Seongnam, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Dept Publ Adm & Policy, 1342 Seongnamdaero, Seongnam, South Korea
来源
COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES | 2023年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
Neo-institutionalism; Organizational change; Institutions; Public organizations; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; FORMAL-STRUCTURE; CONSTRUCTION; RATIONALITY; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1080/23311886.2023.2284239
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This essay reviews the literature and discusses the utility of neo-institutionalism for organizational change in public administration. Neo-institutionalism theory has been characterized as focusing on the similarities of organizations (isomorphism) and the stability of organizational arrangements in a field of organizations. However, in the past two decades, greater attention has been paid to how neo-institutional theory contributes to an understanding of change. This has been done by examining the following: the types of change considered; drivers of organizational change; and reasons for investigating public organizations and the reasons they help gain insight; and research results, including the types of methods used. Neo-institutionalism presents an effective framework to conduct public organization research on organizational change and for public administration practice for several reasons.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Neo-Institutional Theory and Organization Studies: A Mid-Life Crisis? [J].
Alvesson, Mats ;
Spicer, Andre .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2019, 40 (02) :199-218
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1970, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty
[3]   The development of public institutions - Reconsidering the role of leadership [J].
Boin, Arjen ;
Christensen, Tom .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2008, 40 (03) :271-297
[4]  
Bovaird Tony., 2009, PUBLIC MANAGEMENT GO, V2nd
[5]  
Brint S., 1991, NEW I ORG ANAL
[6]  
Brunsson Nils., 2007, CONSEQUENCES DECISIO
[7]  
BUCHKO AA, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P410, DOI 10.5465/256836
[8]  
Caemmerer B., 2009, P AUSTR NZ MARK AC M
[9]   Strategic rationality and endogenous institutional change [J].
Calvert, Randall .
RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 29 (01) :91-110
[10]   When accreditation standards change: Factors affecting differential responsiveness of public and private organizations [J].
Casile, M ;
Davis-Blake, A .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (01) :180-195