Distribution and habitat preference of polar cod (Boreogadus saida) in the Bering and Chukchi Seas inferred from species-specific detection of environmental DNA

被引:1
作者
Kawakami, Tatsuya [1 ]
Yamazaki, Aya [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Hai-Chao [3 ]
Ueno, Hiromichi [1 ]
Kasai, Akihide [1 ]
机构
[1] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Fisheries Sci, Hakodate, Japan
[2] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Res Inst Global Change, Marine Biodivers & Environm Assessment Res Ctr, Yokosuka, Japan
[3] Hokkaido Univ, Sch Fisheries Sci, Hakodate, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Arctic; environmental DNA; logistic regression analysis; polar cod (Boreogadus saida); quantitative PCR; sea ice; species-specific assay; water mass classification; LARVAL FISH ASSEMBLAGES; BEAUFORT SEA; QUANTIFICATION; DEGRADATION; COMMUNITIES; ICE;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2023.1193083
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ongoing warming and sea-ice reductions in the Arctic can seriously impact cold-water species, such as polar cod (Boreogadus saida), necessitating biomonitoring to reveal the ecological consequences. Recent methodological advancements in environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques have increased our ability to conduct ecological monitoring at various locations, including the Arctic. This study aimed to provide an overview of the distribution of polar cod across the Bering and Chukchi Seas by employing species-specific detection of eDNA. First, we successfully developed novel species-specific qPCR assay targeting the mitochondrial D-loop region, which exclusively amplifies eDNA derived from polar cod. Subsequently, polar cod eDNA was detected using the assay from the samples that we collected latitudinally across the study area during the open -water season. Polar cod eDNA was primarily detected in the surface water from the central Chukchi Sea shelf and the northernmost observation line (75 degrees N), which was located on the shelf slope, off the Point Barrow, and in the marginal ice zone. In contrast, only trace amounts of eDNA were detected in the Bering Sea. This pattern corresponded well with the distribution of water masses classified based on environmental conditions. The detection of eDNA in surface water was clearly limited to cold (-1 to 5 degrees C) and low salinity (25-32) water, whereas it was detected in a higher salinity range (32-34) in the middle and bottom layers. These findings are consistent with current knowledge about the distribution and habitat of the polar cod, suggesting that eDNA can be regarded as a reliable tool to replace or supplement conventional methods. Incorporating eDNA techniques into large-scale oceanographic surveys can improve the spatial and temporal resolution of fish species detection with a reasonable sampling effort and will facilitate the continuous monitoring of Arctic ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [71] Quantitative assessment of multiple fish species around artificial reefs combining environmental DNA metabarcoding and acoustic survey
    Sato, Masaaki
    Inoue, Nariaki
    Nambu, Ryogen
    Furuichi, Naoki
    Imaizumi, Tomohito
    Ushio, Masayuki
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [72] Sevellec M., 2021, Environmental DNA, V3, P573, DOI [10.1002/edn3.155, DOI 10.1002/EDN3.155]
  • [73] Environmental DNA provides quantitative estimates of Pacific hake abundance and distribution in the open ocean
    Shelton, Andrew Olaf
    Ramon-Laca, Ana
    Wells, Abigail
    Clemons, Julia
    Chu, Dezhang
    Feist, Blake E.
    Kelly, Ryan P.
    Parker-Stetter, Sandra L.
    Thomas, Rebecca
    Nichols, Krista M.
    Park, Linda
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 289 (1971)
  • [74] Shupe M. D., 2020, Arctic Report Card, DOI [10.25923/9g3v-xh92, DOI 10.25923/9G3V-XH92, 10.25923/9G3V-XH92]
  • [75] Population-level inferences from environmental DNA-Current status and future perspectives
    Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng
    Jensen, Mads Reinholdt
    Winkelmann, Inger Eleanor
    Moller, Peter Rask
    Hansen, Michael Moller
    Thomsen, Philip Francis
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2020, 13 (02): : 245 - 262
  • [76] Seawater environmental DNA reflects seasonality of a coastal fish community
    Sigsgaard, Eva Egelyng
    Nielsen, Ida Broman
    Carl, Henrik
    Krag, Marcus Anders
    Knudsen, Steen Wilhelm
    Xing, Yingchun
    Holm-Hansen, Tore Hejl
    Moller, Peter Rask
    Thomsen, Philip Francis
    [J]. MARINE BIOLOGY, 2017, 164 (06)
  • [77] Skjoldal H. R., 2022, ICES Cooperative Research Reports, V355, DOI [10.17895/ices.pub.20191787, DOI 10.17895/ICES.PUB.20191787]
  • [78] Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment
    Stat, Michael
    Huggett, Megan J.
    Bernasconi, Rachele
    DiBattista, Joseph D.
    Berry, Tina E.
    Newman, Stephen J.
    Harvey, Euan S.
    Bunce, Michael
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [79] A systematic approach to evaluate the influence of environmental conditions on eDNA detection success in aquatic ecosystems
    Stoeckle, Bernhard C.
    Beggel, Sebastian
    Cerwenka, Alexander F.
    Motivans, Elena
    Kuehn, Ralph
    Geist, Juergen
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [80] Taberlet P, 2018, ENVIRONMENTAL DNA: FOR BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH AND MONITORING