Acute Effects of Continuous and Intermittent Blood Flow Restriction on Sprint Interval Performance and Muscle Oxygen Responses

Wizenberg, AM, Gonzalez-Rojas, D, Rivera, PM, Proppe, CE, Laurel, KP, Stout, JR, Fukuda, DH, Billaut, F, Keller, JL, and Hill, EC. Acute effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction on sprint interval performance and muscle oxygen responses. J Strength Cond Res 37(10): e546-e554, 2023-This investigation aimed to examine the acute effects of continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction (CBFR and IBFR, respectively) during sprint interval training (SIT) on muscle oxygenation, sprint performance, and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). Fifteen men (22.6 & PLUSMN; 2.4 years; 176 & PLUSMN; 6.3 cm; 80.0 & PLUSMN; 12.6 kg) completed in random order a SIT session with CBFR, IBFR (applied during rest), and no blood flow restriction (NoBFR). Each SIT session consisted of two 30-second all-out sprint tests separated by 2 minutes. Peak power (PP), total work (TW), sprint decrement score (Sdec), RPE, and muscle oxygenation were measured during each sprint. A p value & LE;0.05 was considered statistically significant. PP decreased to a greater extent from sprint 1 to sprint 2 during CBFR (25.5 & PLUSMN; 11.9%) and IBFR (23.4 & PLUSMN; 9.3%) compared with NoBFR (13.4 & PLUSMN; 8.6%). TW was reduced similarly (17,835.6 & PLUSMN; 966.2 to 12,687.2 & PLUSMN; 675.2 J) from sprint 1 to sprint 2 for all 3 conditions, but TW was lower (collapsed across time) for CBFR (14,320.7 & PLUSMN; 769.1 J) than IBFR (15,548.0 & PLUSMN; 840.5 J) and NoBFR (15,915.4 & PLUSMN; 771.5 J). There were no differences in Sdec (84.3 & PLUSMN; 1.7%, 86.1 & PLUSMN; 1.5%, and 87.2 & PLUSMN; 1.1% for CBFR, IBFR, and NoBFR, respectively) or RPE, which increased from sprint 1 (8.5 & PLUSMN; 0.3) to sprint 2 (9.7 & PLUSMN; 0.1). Collective muscle oxygenation responses increased across time and were similar among conditions, whereas increases in deoxy[heme] and total[heme] were greatest for CBFR. Applying BFR during SIT induced greater decrements in PP, and CBFR resulted in greater decrements in work across repeated sprints. The larger increases in deoxy[heme] and total[heme] for CBFR suggested it may induce greater metabolite accumulation than IBFR and NoBFR when combined with SIT.