Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a retrospective study

被引:3
作者
Chen, Fangqian [1 ,2 ]
Lv, Zeping [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Wenqing [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Zhuoqing [1 ,2 ]
Miao, Yiming [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Zifeng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yuchen [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Han [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Minhua [1 ,2 ]
Zong, Yaping [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Jingkun [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Aiguo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sch Med, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai Minimally Invas Surg Ctr, Sch Med, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
关键词
Anastomosis; Intracorporeal; Extracorporeal; Laparoscopic right colectomy; Totally laparoscopic right colectomy; Laparoscopy-assisted right colectomy; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; ASSISTED RIGHT COLECTOMY; RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY; COLON-CANCER; OPEN SURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-023-03023-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe surgical procedure for laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) is not standardized. Some published studies show the superiority of ileocolic anastomosis (IIA), but the evidence so far is insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the potential advantages in postoperative recovery and safety of IIA in LRC.MethodsA total of 114 patients who underwent LRC with IIA (n = 58) or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis (EIA, n = 56) between January 2019 and September 2021 were enrolled. We collected certain factors as clinical features, intraoperative characteristics, oncological outcomes, postoperative recovery, and short-term outcomes. Our primary outcome was time to gastrointestinal (GI) function recovery. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications within 30 days, postoperative pain, and length of hospital stay.ResultsFaster GI recovery and less postoperative pain were observed in patients with IIA compared to EIA [time to first flatus: (2.4 +/- 0.7) vs (2.8 +/- 1.0) days, p < 0.01; time to liquid intake: (3.5 +/- 0.7) vs (4.0 +/- 1.1) days, p = 0.01; postoperative visual analogue scale score: (3.9 +/- 1.0) vs (4.3 +/- 0.6), p = 0.02]. No significant differences were detected in oncological outcomes or postoperative complications. IIA, rather than EIA, tended to be performed in patients with higher body mass index [(23.93 +/- 3.52) vs (22.36 +/- 2.87) kg/m(2), p = 0.01].ConclusionsIIA is associated with faster GI function recovery and less postoperative pain and may be more favorable for obese patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intracorporeal versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: Short-Term Outcomes
    Biondi, Antonio
    Di Mauro, Gianluca
    Morici, Riccardo
    Sangiorgio, Giuseppe
    Vacante, Marco
    Basile, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (24)
  • [42] Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic left colectomy for splenic flexure cancer: results from a multi-institutional audit on 181 consecutive patients
    Milone, Marco
    Angelini, Pierluigi
    Berardi, Giovanna
    Burati, Morena
    Corcione, Francesco
    Delrio, Paolo
    Elmore, Ugo
    Lemma, Maria
    Manigrasso, Michele
    Mellano, Alfredo
    Muratore, Andrea
    Pace, Ugo
    Rega, Daniela
    Rosati, Riccardo
    Tartaglia, Ernesto
    De Palma, Giovanni Domenico
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (08): : 3467 - 3473
  • [43] A single surgeon's experience transitioning to robotic-assisted right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis
    Reitz, Alexandra C. W.
    Lin, Ed
    Rosen, Seth A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (08): : 3525 - 3532
  • [44] The impact of intracorporeal anastomosis in right laparoscopic colectomy in the surgical site infections and the hospital stay: a cohort study
    Hoyuela, Carlos
    Guillaumes, Salvador
    Ardid, Jordi
    Hidalgo, Nils J.
    Bachero, Irene
    Trias, Miquel
    Martrat, Antoni
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (06) : 2125 - 2135
  • [45] Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Konstantinos Perivoliotis
    George Tzovaras
    Konstantinos Tepetes
    Ioannis Baloyiannis
    Updates in Surgery, 2024, 76 : 375 - 396
  • [46] The impact of intracorporeal anastomosis in right laparoscopic colectomy in the surgical site infections and the hospital stay: a cohort study
    Carlos Hoyuela
    Salvador Guillaumes
    Jordi Ardid
    Nils J. Hidalgo
    Irene Bachero
    Miquel Trias
    Antoni Martrat
    Updates in Surgery, 2021, 73 : 2125 - 2135
  • [47] Postoperative Complications Associated With Intra- Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Right Colectomy
    Ishizuka, Mitsuru
    Shibuya, Norisuke
    Takagi, Kazutoshi
    Hachiya, Hiroyuki
    Tago, Kazuma
    Shimizu, Takayuki
    Matsumoto, Takatsugu
    Aoki, Taku
    Kubota, Keiichi
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (12) : 2831 - 2841
  • [48] The Use of Barbed Suture for Intracorporeal Mechanical Anastomosis During a Totally Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: Is It Safe? A Retrospective Nonrandomized Comparative Multicenter Study
    Bracale, Umberto
    Merola, Giovanni
    Cabras, Francesco
    Andreuccetti, Jacopo
    Corcione, Francesco
    Pignata, Giusto
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2018, 25 (03) : 267 - 273
  • [49] Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stefan van Oostendorp
    Arthur Elfrink
    Wernard Borstlap
    Linda Schoonmade
    Colin Sietses
    Jeroen Meijerink
    Jurriaan Tuynman
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 64 - 77
  • [50] Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers
    Milone, Marco
    Elmore, Ugo
    Di Salvo, Enrico
    Delrio, Paolo
    Bucci, Luigi
    Ferulano, Giuseppe Paolo
    Napolitano, Carmine
    Angiolini, Maria Rachele
    Bracale, Umberto
    Clemente, Marco
    D'ambra, Michele
    Luglio, Gaetano
    Musella, Mario
    Pace, Ugo
    Rosati, Riccardo
    Milone, Francesco
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (08): : 2314 - 2320