Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mexico City's Water Cycle

被引:4
|
作者
Garcia Sanchez, Maribel [1 ]
Padilla-Rivera, Alejandro [2 ]
Guereca, Leonor Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ingn, Ave Univ 3000, Coyoacan 04510, Mexico City, Mexico
[2] Univ Calgary, Sch Architecture Planning & Landscape, 2500, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
adequate public water services; quality of employment; S-LCA; social assessment; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; MANAGEMENT; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1002/adsu.202300024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is a need to generate micro-scale indicators to measure progress towards meeting Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 6 and 8. In this sense, this study applies Social Life Cycle Assessment, including Quality of Employment (QoE) and Adequate Public Water Supply (AWS) indicators to assess the social performance of Mexico City's water cycle to identify the level (low, medium and high) of the potential risk of social impact (PR). The results show that the labor hours (WH) required by 1m(3) of water in Mexico City is equivalent to 0.062 WH. The QoE indicator shows that 94% of WH are associated with high PR due to low wages. For AWS, 5% is associated with a high PR for local communities in the Cutzamala system due to poor water quality and consumption of bottled water. This case study demonstrates that progress on QoE and AWS indicators can significantly contribute to achieving SDGs 6 and 8 in the water management of communities involved in Mexico City's water cycle.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach
    Mathe, Syndhia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (08) : 1506 - 1514
  • [32] Past and future of Social Life Cycle Assessment: Historical evolution and research trends
    Ramos Huarachi, Diego Alexis
    Moro Piekarski, Cassiano
    Neves Puglieri, Fabio
    Carlos de Francisco, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264
  • [33] Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA)
    Annekatrin Lehmann
    Eva Zschieschang
    Marzia Traverso
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    Liselotte Schebek
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1581 - 1592
  • [34] Social hotspots life cycle assessment: A case study on social risks of an antimicrobial keyboard cover
    Pucciarelli, Martina
    Traverso, Marzia
    Lettieri, Paola
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 311
  • [35] Life cycle analysis of urban water cycle in two Spanish areas: Inland city and island area
    Uche, J.
    Martinez, A.
    Castellano, C.
    Subiela, V.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2013, 51 (1-3) : 280 - 291
  • [36] Social Life-Cycle Assessment in the Construction Industry: A Review of Characteristics, Limitations, and Challenges of S-LCA through Case Studies
    Ayassamy, Prisca
    Pellerin, Robert
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [37] Blockchain technology and Social Life Cycle Assessment: synergies and implications
    D'Eusanio, Manuela
    Petti, Luigia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024,
  • [38] An integrated social life cycle assessment of freight transport systems
    Jose Luis Osorio-Tejada
    Eva Llera-Sastresa
    Sabina Scarpellini
    Ahmad Hariza Hashim
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 1088 - 1105
  • [39] Determining the principal references of the social life cycle assessment of products
    Mattioda, Rosana Adami
    Mazzi, Anna
    Canciglieri, Osiris, Jr.
    Scipioni, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (08) : 1155 - 1165
  • [40] A systematic review of consequential life cycle assessment in whole building life cycle assessment
    Udisi, B.
    Gorgolewski, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 7 (02):