A framework to measure readiness and barriers for the implementation of Industry 4.0: A case approach

被引:33
作者
Govindan, Kannan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Arampatzis, Georgios [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, China Inst FTZ Supply Chain, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Danish Inst Adv Study, Ctr Sustainable Supply Chain Engn, Dept Technol & Innovat, Campusvej 55, Odense, Denmark
[3] Yonsei Univ, Yonsei Frontier Lab, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Woxsen Univ, Sch Business, Sadasivpet, Telangana, India
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; Readiness; Barriers; DEMATEL; MCDM; Denmark; SUPPLY CHAIN; PERSPECTIVE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; REVOLUTION; DRIVERS; LOGISTICS; MATURITY; CONTEXT; ENABLER;
D O I
10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101249
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Large businesses perceive the vital usefulness of Industry 4.0. They recognize how beneficial its implementation is to reinforce business competitiveness and to conserve, or even better, to increase their market share. Hence, top business management has embraced the challenge of the time: to evaluate the current level of digitization with the objective of proceeding to a full digitization phase in the future. With this concern, this paper proposes a framework to assist industries in promoting Industry 4.0 through two phases. In the initial phase, the case company's level of readiness is evaluated, and in the second phase, the barriers that exist within the implementation of Industry 4.0 (based on the company's readiness, obtained from the previous phase) are analyzed. Both phases have been carried out at a Danish case industry which is a third-tier supplier of anti-noise shims and back plates for manufacturers of disc brake linings. In the first phase, the assessment of readiness for Industry 4.0 demonstrates that the case industry is not fully ready; instead, they reside in the position of Industry 3.5 (in the middle of 3.0 and 4.0 revolutions). The limiting barriers to change for Industry 4.0 implementation are identified during the systematic literature review and analyzed using the DEMATEL method based on the industrial decision-makers' responses in the second phase. Moreover, the analysis demonstrates the most influential barrier category is the policy & organization category. The barrier "leadership" is considered the greater influencer of all since it responds in some way to almost all 21 barriers. Thus, leadership is the most significant barrier a company must overcome to adopt the Industry 4.0 concept. In addition, firms are challenged by the organizational changes that the adoption of Industry 4.0 will bring, and the tool of organizational change management will be handy.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]   Prioritizing the barriers of green smart manufacturing using AHP in implementing Industry 4.0: a case from Indian automotive industry [J].
Agarwal, Sucheta ;
Saxena, Kuldeep Kumar ;
Agrawal, Vivek ;
Dixit, Jitendra Kumar ;
Prakash, Chander ;
Buddhi, Dharam ;
Mohammed, Kahtan A. .
TQM JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (01) :71-89
[2]   Evaluation of Key Challenges to Industry 4.0 in Indian Context: A DEMATEL Approach [J].
Aggarwal, Ankur ;
Gupta, Sumit ;
Ojha, Manish Kumar .
ADVANCES IN INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2019, :387-396
[3]   Organizational and managerial challenges in the path toward Industry 4.0 [J].
Agostini, Lara ;
Filippini, Roberto .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 22 (03) :406-421
[4]   Modelling the barriers of Health 4.0-the fourth healthcare industrial revolution in India by TISM [J].
Ajmera, Puneeta ;
Jain, Vineet .
OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (3-4) :129-145
[5]  
Akdil KY, 2018, SPRINGER SER ADV MAN, P61, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5_4
[6]   Tracking the maturity of industry 4.0: the perspective of a real scenario [J].
Alcacer, Vitor ;
Rodrigues, Carolina ;
Carvalho, Helena ;
Cruz-Machado, Virgilio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 116 (7-8) :2161-2181
[7]   Soft and Hard Total Quality Management Practices Promote Industry 4.0 Readiness: A SEM-Neural Network Approach [J].
Ali, Kashif ;
Johl, Satirenjit Kaur ;
Muneer, Amgad ;
Alwadain, Ayed ;
Ali, Rao Faizan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
[8]   Impact of total quality management on industry 4.0 readiness and practices: does firm size matter? [J].
Ali, Kashif ;
Johl, Satirenjit Kaur .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2023, 36 (04) :567-589
[9]  
Altendorfer-Kaiser S., 2017, ADV PRODUCTION MANAG, V1, P30, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6]
[10]  
Ang JH, 2016, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P5301, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2016.7748364