Does FDI affect environmental degradation? Examining pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses using ARDL modelling

被引:89
作者
Kisswani, Khalid M. [1 ]
Zaitouni, Michel [2 ]
机构
[1] Gulf Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Econ & Finance, Hawally, Kuwait
[2] Gulf Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Business Adm, Hawally, Kuwait
关键词
pollution; FDI; ASEAN; cointegration; ARDL; causality; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; PANEL-DATA ANALYSIS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CO2; EMISSIONS; CARBON EMISSIONS; MIDDLE-EAST; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; STRUCTURAL BREAKS; TRADE GOOD;
D O I
10.1080/13547860.2021.1949086
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) assumes that polluting industries will move to regions with lesser rigorous environmental regulations. On the other hand, pollution halo hypothesis presumes that industries transfer their clean technologies through FDI inflows to the host countries. Following these theoretical perceptions, this paper empirically examines how foreign direct investment (FDI) affects pollution (CO2 emissions) for four selected Asian countries (Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand) over the period 1971-2014. This is done by applying the autoregressive distributed lags (ARDL) model of Pesaran et al.. The ARDL model is employed under two scenarios: without and with structural breaks. The long-run findings, for both scenarios, suggest support for the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) for the Philippines only. Whereas, the findings lend support for the pollution halo hypothesis for Malaysia and Singapore. In addition, the paper explores the causality direction between FDI and pollution (CO2 emissions) using the Vector Error Correction model (VECM). The results show mixed long- and short-run Granger causality findings.
引用
收藏
页码:1406 / 1432
页数:27
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Abdouli M, 2018, EMPIR ECON, V54, P1717, DOI 10.1007/s00181-017-1263-0
[2]   Investigating the validity of pollution haven hypothesis in the gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries [J].
Al-mulali, Usama ;
Tang, Chor Foon .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 60 :813-819
[3]   Factors affecting CO2 emission in the Middle East: A panel data analysis [J].
Al-mulali, Usama .
ENERGY, 2012, 44 (01) :564-569
[4]   In Search of Environmental Spillovers [J].
Albornoz, Facundo ;
Cole, Matthew A. ;
Elliott, Robert J. R. ;
Ercolani, Marco G. .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2009, 32 (01) :136-163
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, World Investment Report
[6]   Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in Asian countries? A panel data analysis [J].
Ansari, Mohd Arshad ;
Khan, Nisar Ahmed ;
Ganaie, Aadil Ahmad .
OPEC ENERGY REVIEW, 2019, 43 (02) :109-135
[7]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[8]  
Asghari M., 2013, INT J SCI RES ENV SC, V1, P92, DOI [DOI 10.12983/IJSRES-2013-P092-100, 10.12983/ijsres-2013-p092-100]
[9]   Carbon emissions, trade liberalization, and the Japan-ASEAN interaction: A group-wise examination [J].
Atici, Cemal .
JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIES, 2012, 26 (01) :167-178
[10]   Factors determining energy consumption: Evidence from Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand [J].
Azam, Muhammad ;
Khan, Abdul Qayyum ;
Zaman, Khalid ;
Ahmad, Mehboob .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :1123-1131