Bayesian evidence and model selection approach for time-dependent dark energy

被引:0
作者
Khorasani, Mohsen [1 ,2 ]
Mosleh, Moein [1 ,2 ]
Sheykhi, Ahmad [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ, Sch Sci, Dept Phys, Shiraz 7194684795, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ, Sch Sci, Biruni Observ, Shiraz 7194684795, Iran
关键词
fmethods: statistical; dark energy; BARYON ACOUSTIC-OSCILLATIONS; COSMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES; CENT DISTANCE; EQUATION; GALAXIES; UNIVERSE; SUPERNOVAE; COMPONENT; SAMPLE; STATE;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/stad1181
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We use parametrized post-Friedmann (PPF) description for dark energy and apply ellipsoidal nested sampling to perform the Bayesian model selection method on different time-dependent dark energy models using a combination of Planck and data based on distance measurements, namely baryon acoustic oscillations and supernovae luminosity distance. Models with two and three free parameters described in terms of linear scale factor a, or scaled in units of e-folding ln a are considered. Our results show that parametrizing dark energy in terms of ln a provides better constraints on the free parameters than polynomial expressions. In general, two free-parameter models are adequate to describe the dynamics of the dark energy compared to their three free-parameter generalizations. According to the Bayesian evidence, determining the strength of support for cosmological constant ? over polynomial dark energy models remains inconclusive. Furthermore, considering the R statistic as the tension metric shows that one of the polynomial models gives rise to a tension between Planck and distance measurements data sets. The preference for the logarithmic equation of state over ? is inconclusive, and the strength of support for ? CDM over the oscillating model is moderate.
引用
收藏
页码:3648 / 3655
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [21] Cosmic complementarity:: H0 and Ωm, from combining cosmic microwave background experiments and redshift surveys
    Eisenstein, DJ
    Hu, W
    Tegmark, M
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 504 (02) : L57 - L60
  • [22] Crossing the phantom divide with parametrized post-Friedmann dark energy
    Fang, Wenjuan
    Hu, Wayne
    Lewis, Antony
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2008, 78 (08):
  • [23] MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics
    Feroz, F.
    Hobson, M. P.
    Bridges, M.
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 398 (04) : 1601 - 1614
  • [24] Feroz F., 2019, OPEN J ASTROPHYS, V2, P10, DOI [DOI 10.21105/ASTRO.1306.2144, 10.21105/astro.1306.2144]
  • [25] Quantifying tensions in cosmological parameters: Interpreting the DES evidence ratio
    Handley, Will
    Lemos, Pablo
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2019, 100 (04)
  • [26] Hinton S.R., 2016, The Journal of Open Source Software, V1, DOI 10.21105/joss.00045
  • [27] Crossing the phantom divide: Dark energy internal degrees of freedom
    Hu, W
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2005, 71 (04): : 047301 - 1
  • [28] WMAP constraints on low redshift evolution of dark energy
    Jassal, HK
    Bagla, JS
    Padmanabhan, T
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 356 (01) : L11 - L16
  • [29] Jeffreys H., 1939, THEOR PROB
  • [30] The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: improved distance measurements to z=1 with reconstruction of the baryonic acoustic feature
    Kazin, Eyal A.
    Koda, Jun
    Blake, Chris
    Padmanabhan, Nikhil
    Brough, Sarah
    Colless, Matthew
    Contreras, Carlos
    Couch, Warrick
    Croom, Scott
    Croton, Darren J.
    Davis, Tamara M.
    Drinkwater, Michael J.
    Forster, Karl
    Gilbank, David
    Gladders, Mike
    Glazebrook, Karl
    Jelliffe, Ben
    Jurek, Russell J.
    Li, I-hui
    Madore, Barry
    Martin, D. Christopher
    Pimbblet, Kevin
    Poole, Gregory B.
    Pracy, Michael
    Sharp, Rob
    Wisnioski, Emily
    Woods, David
    Wyder, Ted K.
    Yee, H. K. C.
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 441 (04) : 3524 - 3542