Predicting case difficulty in endodontic microsurgery using machine learning algorithms

被引:4
作者
Qu, Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wen, Yiting [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Ming [4 ]
Guo, Kailing [4 ]
Huang, Xiangya [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Gu, Lisha [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat sen Univ, Hosp Stomatol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Prov Key Lab Stomatol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat sen Univ, Guanghua Sch Stomatol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] South China Univ Technol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat sen Univ, Hosp Stomatol, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Stomatol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Endodontics; Pulpitis; Machine learning; Complexity analysis; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104522
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for case difficulty prediction in endodontic microsurgery, assisting clinicians in preoperative analysis.Methods: The cone-beam computed tomographic images were collected from 261 patients with 341 teeth and used for radiographic examination and measurement. Through linear regression (LR), support vector regression (SVR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithms, four models were established according to different loss functions, including the L1-loss LR model, L2-loss LR model, SVR model and XGBoost model. Five-fold cross -validation was applied in model training and validation. Explained variance score (EVS), coefficient of deter-mination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE) and median absolute error (MedAE) were calculated to evaluate the prediction performance.Results: The MAE, MSE and MedAE values of the XGBoost model were the lowest, which were 0.1010, 0.0391 and 0.0235, respectively. The EVS and R2 values of the XGBoost model were the highest, which were 0.7885 and 0.7967, respectively. The factors used to predict the case difficulty in endodontic microsurgery were ordered according to their relative importance, including lesion size, the distance between apex and adjacent important anatomical structures, root filling density, root apex diameter, root resorption, tooth type, tooth length, root filling length, root canal curvature and the number of root canals.Conclusions: The XGBoost model outperformed the LR and SVR models on all evaluation metrics, which can assist clinicians in preoperative analysis. The relative feature importance provides a reference to develop the scoring system for case difficulty assessment in endodontic microsurgery. Clinical significance: Preoperative case assessment is a crucial step to identify potential risks and make referral decisions. Machine learning models for case difficulty prediction in endodontic microsurgery can assist clinicians in preoperative analysis efficiently and accurately.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   The Buffalo study: Outcome and associated predictors in endodontic microsurgery- a cohort study [J].
Azim, A. A. ;
Albanyan, H. ;
Azim, K. A. ;
Piasecki, L. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2021, 54 (03) :301-318
[2]  
Bishop C. M., 2007, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning Information Science and Statistics, V1st
[3]   A Machine-Learning Method of Predicting Vital Capacity Plateau Value for Ventilatory Pump Failure Based on Data Mining [J].
Chang, Wenbing ;
Ji, Xinpeng ;
Wang, Liping ;
Liu, Houxiang ;
Zhang, Yue ;
Chen, Bang ;
Zhou, Shenghan .
HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (10)
[4]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[5]   Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning [J].
Choi, Rene Y. ;
Coyner, Aaron S. ;
Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree ;
Chiang, Michael F. ;
Campbell, J. Peter .
TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 9 (02)
[6]   Identification of areas of grading difficulties in prostate cancer and comparison with artificial intelligence assisted grading [J].
Egevad, Lars ;
Swanberg, Daniela ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Strom, Peter ;
Kartasalo, Kimmo ;
Olsson, Henrik ;
Berney, Dan M. ;
Bostwick, David G. ;
Evans, Andrew J. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. ;
Iczkowski, Kenneth A. ;
Kench, James G. ;
Kristiansen, Glen ;
Leite, Katia R. M. ;
McKenney, Jesse K. ;
Oxley, Jon ;
Pan, Chin-Chen ;
Samaratunga, Hemamali ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Takahashi, Hiroyuki ;
Tsuzuki, Toyonori ;
van der Kwast, Theo ;
Varma, Murali ;
Zhou, Ming ;
Clements, Mark ;
Eklund, Martin .
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2020, 477 (06) :777-786
[7]   Evaluation of Quality and Preparation Time of Retrograde Cavities in Root Canals Filled with GuttaCore and Cold Lateral Condensation Technique [J].
Endal, Unni ;
Shen, Ya ;
Ma, Jingzhi ;
Yang, Yan ;
Haapasalo, Markus .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2018, 44 (04) :639-642
[8]   Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting - Rejoinder [J].
Friedman, J ;
Hastie, T ;
Tibshirani, R .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2000, 28 (02) :400-407
[9]   A guide to machine learning for biologists [J].
Greener, Joe G. ;
Kandathil, Shaun M. ;
Moffat, Lewis ;
Jones, David T. .
NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2022, 23 (01) :40-55
[10]  
Hargreaves K., 2011, COHENS PATHWAYS PULP