Multi-Reservoir Flood Control Operation Using Improved Bald Eagle Search Algorithm with ε Constraint Method

被引:16
|
作者
Wang, Wenchuan [1 ]
Tian, Weican [1 ]
Chau, Kwokwing [2 ]
Zang, Hongfei [1 ]
Ma, Mingwei [1 ]
Feng, Zhongkai [3 ]
Xu, Dongmei [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Coll Water Resources, Henan Key Lab Water Resources Conservat & Intens U, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210024, Peoples R China
关键词
flood control operation; bald eagle search algorithm; multi-reservoir; epsilon constraint method; penalty function method; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM; PENALTY-FUNCTION; WATER;
D O I
10.3390/w15040692
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The reservoir flood control operation problem has the characteristics of multiconstraint, high-dimension, nonlinearity, and being difficult to solve. In order to better solve this problem, this paper proposes an improved bald eagle search algorithm (CABES) coupled with epsilon-constraint method (epsilon-CABES). In order to test the performance of the CABES algorithm, a typical test function is used to simulate and verify CABES. The results are compared with the bald eagle algorithm and particle swarm optimization algorithm to verify its superiority. In order to further test the rationality and effectiveness of the CABES method, two single reservoirs and a multi-reservoir system are selected for flood control operation, and the epsilon constraint method and the penalty function method (CF-CABES) are compared, respectively. Results show that peak clipping rates of epsilon-CABES and CF-CABES are both 60.28% for Shafan Reservoir and 52.03% for Dahuofang Reservoir, respectively. When solving the multi-reservoir joint flood control operation system, only epsilon-CABES flood control operation is successful, and the peak clipping rate is 51.76%. Therefore, in the single-reservoir flood control operation, the penalty function method and the epsilon constraint method have similar effects. However, in multi-reservoir operation, the epsilon constraint method is better than the penalty function method. In summary, the epsilon-CABES algorithm is more reliable and effective, which provides a new method for solving the joint flood control scheduling problem of large reservoirs.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of the gravity search algorithm to multi-reservoir operation optimization
    Bozorg-Haddad, Omid
    Janbaz, Mahdieh
    Loaiciga, Hugo A.
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2016, 98 : 173 - 185
  • [2] State-of-the-art of the flood control operation of multi-reservoir system
    Wang, D.
    Xu, S.-B.
    2001, China Water Power Press (12):
  • [3] Improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for multi-reservoir system operation
    Zhang, Jun
    Wu, Zhen
    Cheng, Chun-tian
    Zhang, Shi-qin
    WATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2011, 4 (01) : 61 - U171
  • [4] Introducing improved atom search optimization (IASO) algorithm: Application to optimal operation of multi-reservoir systems
    Moslemzadeh, Mohsen
    Farzin, Saeed
    Karami, Hojat
    Ahmadianfar, Iman
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2023, 131
  • [6] Optimal Operation of Multi-Reservoir System Based-On Cuckoo Search Algorithm
    Ming, Bo
    Chang, Jian-xia
    Huang, Qiang
    Wang, Yi-min
    Huang, Sheng-zhi
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (15) : 5671 - 5687
  • [7] Research on Multi-objective Optimization of Freight Train Operation Process Based on Improved Bald Eagle Search Algorithm
    Yi, Lingzhi
    Zhang, Dake
    Li, Wang
    Duan, Renzhe
    Jiang, Peng
    Liu, Bo
    Journal of Computers (Taiwan), 2022, 33 (05) : 135 - 150
  • [8] Optimal Operation of Multi-Reservoir System Based-On Cuckoo Search Algorithm
    Bo Ming
    Jian-xia Chang
    Qiang Huang
    Yi-min Wang
    Sheng-zhi Huang
    Water Resources Management, 2015, 29 : 5671 - 5687
  • [9] Improved bald eagle search algorithm fused with multiple strategies
    Guo Y.-C.
    Zhang C.-S.
    Duan Q.-N.
    Luo Y.-H.
    Cheng Q.
    Qian B.
    Hu R.
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2024, 39 (01): : 69 - 77
  • [10] Optimal Operation of Multi-reservoir System Utilizing DEA, AIDE Algorithm and Flood Control Assessment by MCDM Approach
    Sinha, Lalitesh
    Narulkar, Sandeep M.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, : 1783 - 1802