Systematic review of high-dose amikacin regimens for the treatment of Gram-negative infections based on EUCAST dosing recommendations

被引:2
作者
Frost, Kevin J. [1 ,8 ]
Hamilton, Ryan A. [2 ,3 ]
Hughes, Stephen [4 ]
Jamieson, Conor [5 ]
Rafferty, Paul [6 ]
Troise, Oliver [4 ]
Jenkins, Abi [7 ]
机构
[1] Airedale NHS Fdn Trust, Keighley, England
[2] De Montfort Univ, Pharm, Leicester, England
[3] Kettering Gen Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Pharm, Kettering, England
[4] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Pharm, London, England
[5] NHS England & NHS Improvement Midlands, Birmingham, England
[6] Southern Hlth & Social Care Trust, Pharm, Portadown, North Ireland
[7] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham, England
[8] Airedale NHS Fdn Trust, Keighley BD20 6TD, England
关键词
therapeutic drug monitoring; pharmacokinetics; clinical medicine; evidence-based medicine; safety; microbiology; pharmacology; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; PHARMACOKINETICS; SERUM; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003421
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundUpdated European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) amikacin breakpoints for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa included revised dosing recommendations of 25-30 mg/kg to achieve key pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, higher than recommended in the British National Formulary. The objectives of this review were to identify clinical evidence for high-dose amikacin regimens and to determine drug exposures that are related to adverse events and toxicity. MethodsThe literature search was conducted in October 2021 and updated in May 2022 using electronic databases for any study reporting adult participants treated with amikacin at doses >= 20 mg/kg/day. Reference lists of included papers were also screened for potential papers. Data were extracted for pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical outcomes, presented in a summary table and consolidated narratively. Meta-analysis was not possible. Each study was assessed for bias before, during and after the intervention using the ROBINS-I tool. ResultsNine studies (total 501 participants in 10 reports) were identified and included, eight of which were observational studies. Assessment of bias showed substantial flaws. Dosing regimens ranged from 25 to 30 mg/kg/day. Six studies adjusted the dose in obesity when participants had a body mass index of >= 30 kg/m(2). Target peak serum concentrations ranged from 60 mg/L to 80 mg/L and 59.6-81.8% of patients achieved these targets, but there was no information on clinical outcomes. Two studies reported the impact of high-dose amikacin on renal function. No studies reporting auditory or vestibular toxicity were identified. ConclusionAll included papers were limited by a significant risk of bias, while methodological and reporting heterogeneity made drawing conclusions challenging. Lack of information on the impact on renal function or ototoxicity means high-dose regimens should be used cautiously in older people. There is a need for a consensus guideline for high-dose amikacin to be written.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 195
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Impact of a high loading dose of amikacin in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock
    Allou, Nicolas
    Bouteau, Astrid
    Allyn, Jerome
    Snauwaert, Aurelie
    Valance, Dorothee
    Jabot, Julien
    Bouchet, Bruno
    Galliot, Richard
    Corradi, Laure
    Montravers, Philippe
    Augustin, Pascal
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2016, 6
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, British national formulary.
  • [3] Association of Scottish Antimicrobial Pharmacists and Healthcare Improvement Scotland, SHOULD ANT BE DOS OB
  • [4] Reappraisal of Contemporary Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles for Informing Aminoglycoside Dosing
    Bland, Christopher M.
    Pai, Manjunath P.
    Lodise, Thomas P.
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2018, 38 (12): : 1229 - 1238
  • [5] A high-dose aminoglycoside regimen combined with renal replacement therapy for the treatment of MDR pathogens: a proof-of-concept study
    Brasseur, Alexandre
    Hites, Maya
    Roisin, Sandrine
    Cotton, Frederic
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    De Backer, Daniel
    Jacobs, Frederique
    Taccone, Fabio Silvio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 71 (05) : 1386 - 1394
  • [6] Population pharmacokinetics of single-dose amikacin in critically ill patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia
    Burdet, C.
    Pajot, O.
    Couffignal, C.
    Armand-Lefevre, L.
    Foucrier, A.
    Laouenan, C.
    Wolff, M.
    Massias, L.
    Mentre, F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 71 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [7] PK/PD targets of amikacin and gentamicin in ICU patients
    Coste, A.
    Deslandes, G.
    Jalin, L.
    Corvec, S.
    Caillon, J.
    Boutoille, D.
    Gregoire, M.
    Bretonniere, C.
    [J]. MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES, 2020, 50 (08): : 709 - 714
  • [8] European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), AM RAT EUCAST CLIN B
  • [9] European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), CLIN BREAKP DOS ANT
  • [10] Time of peak drug concentration after a single dose and a dose at steady state
    Greenberg, HE
    England, MJ
    Hellriegel, ET
    Bjornsson, TD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 37 (06) : 480 - 485