Restricted mean survival time versus conventional effect summary for treatment decision-making: A mixed-methods study

被引:1
|
作者
Shi, Sandra M. [1 ]
Palmer, Jennifer A. [2 ]
Newmeyer, Natalie [1 ]
Carroll, Danette [1 ]
Steinberg, Nessa [1 ]
Olivieri-Mui, Brianne [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Dae Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew SeniorLife, Hinda & Arthur Marcus Inst Aging Res, Boston, MA USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Bouve Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
evidence communication; hypertension; mixed methods; restricted mean survival time; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.18107
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Treatment effect is typically summarized in terms of relative risk reduction or number needed to treat ("conventional effect summary"). Restricted mean survival time (RMST) summarizes treatment effect in terms of a gain or loss in event-free days. Older adults' preference between the two effect summary measures has not been studied. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study using a quantitative survey and qualitative semi-structured interviews. For the survey, we enrolled 102 residents with hypertension at five senior housing facilities (mean age 81.3 years, 82 female, 95 white race). We randomly assigned respondents to either RMST-based (n = 49) or conventional decision aid (n = 53) about the benefits and harms of intensive versus standard blood pressure-lowering strategies and compared decision conflict scale (DCS) responses (range: 0 [no conflict] to 100 [maximum conflict]; <25 is associated with implementing decisions). We used a purposive sample of 23 survey respondents stratified by both their random assignment and DCS from the survey. Inductive qualitative thematic analysis explored complementary perspectives on preferred ways of summarizing treatment effects. Results: The mean (standard deviation) total DCS was 22.0 (14.3) for the conventional decision aid group and 16.7 (14.1) for the RMST-based decision aid group (p = 0.06), but the proportion of participants with a DCS <25 was higher in the RMST-based group (26 [49.1%] vs 34 [69.4%]; p = 0.04). Qualitative interviews suggested that, regardless of effect summary measure, older individuals' preference depended on their ability to clearly comprehend quantitative information, clarity of presentation in the visual aid, and inclusion of desired information. Conclusions: When choosing a blood pressure-lowering strategy, older adults' perceived uncertainty may be reduced with a time-based effect summary, although our study was underpowered to detect a statistically significant
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 537
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Piloting a shared decision-making clinician training intervention in maternity care in Australia: A mixed methods study
    Clerke, Teena
    Margetts, Jayne
    Donovan, Helen
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Makris, Angela
    Canty, Alison
    Ruhotas, Annette
    Catling, Christine
    Henry, Amanda
    MIDWIFERY, 2023, 126
  • [32] Quality of life, recovery and decision-making: a mixed methods study of mental health recovery in social care
    Coffey, Michael
    Hannigan, Ben
    Meudell, Alan
    Jones, Mari
    Hunt, Julian
    Fitzsimmons, Deb
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 54 (06) : 715 - 723
  • [33] Shared Decision Making with Acutely Hospitalized, Older Poly-Medicated Patients: A Mixed-Methods Study in an Emergency Department
    Fabricius, Pia Keinicke
    Aharaz, Anissa
    Stefansdottir, Nina Thorny
    Houlind, Morten Baltzer
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    Andersen, Ove
    Kirk, Jeanette Wassar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (11)
  • [34] Voices unveiled: a mixed-methods exploration of family planning education, access, and Sociocultural determinants for enhancing contraceptive decision-making in western Gujarat, India
    Shrivastav, Vaibhav
    Yogesh, M.
    Parmar, Dipesh
    Gandhi, Rohankumar
    Sojitra, Sakshi Atulbhai
    Subhash, Kundal Tanmay
    Prasannakumar, Shah Pranjal
    Ashokbhai, Lathiya Moxa
    CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2025, 10 (01)
  • [35] Parental expectations of raising a child with disability in decision-making for prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy: A mixed methods study
    Ngan, Olivia Miu Yung
    Yi, Huso
    Bryant, Louise
    Sahota, Daljit Singh
    Chan, Olivia Yiu Man
    Ahmed, Shenaz
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (11) : 2373 - 2383
  • [36] Informing the implementation of evidence-informed decision making interventions using a social network analysis perspective; a mixed-methods study
    Reza Yousefi Nooraie
    Lynne Lohfeld
    Alexandra Marin
    Robert Hanneman
    Maureen Dobbins
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [37] Informing the implementation of evidence-informed decision making interventions using a social network analysis perspective; a mixed-methods study
    Nooraie, Reza Yousefi
    Lohfeld, Lynne
    Marin, Alexandra
    Hanneman, Robert
    Dobbins, Maureen
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [38] Abortion decision-making process trajectories and determinants in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lokubal, Paul
    Corcuera, Ines
    Balil, Jessica Macias
    Frischer, Sandrena Ruth
    Kayemba, Christine Nalwadda
    Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
    Opondo, Charles
    Nair, Manisha
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2022, 54
  • [39] Healthcare providers' intentions to engage in an interprofessional approach to shared decision-making in home care programs: A mixed methods study
    Legare, France
    Stacey, Dawn
    Briere, Nathalie
    Fraser, Kimberley
    Desroches, Sophie
    Dumont, Serge
    Sales, Anne
    Puma, Carole
    Aube, Denise
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2013, 27 (03) : 214 - 222
  • [40] Supporting women's empowerment by changing intra-household decision-making: A mixed-methods analysis of a field experiment in rural south-west Tanzania
    Lecoutere, Els
    Chu, Lan
    DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2024, 42 (03)