Restricted mean survival time versus conventional effect summary for treatment decision-making: A mixed-methods study

被引:1
|
作者
Shi, Sandra M. [1 ]
Palmer, Jennifer A. [2 ]
Newmeyer, Natalie [1 ]
Carroll, Danette [1 ]
Steinberg, Nessa [1 ]
Olivieri-Mui, Brianne [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Dae Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew SeniorLife, Hinda & Arthur Marcus Inst Aging Res, Boston, MA USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Bouve Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
evidence communication; hypertension; mixed methods; restricted mean survival time; VALIDATION; MORTALITY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.18107
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Treatment effect is typically summarized in terms of relative risk reduction or number needed to treat ("conventional effect summary"). Restricted mean survival time (RMST) summarizes treatment effect in terms of a gain or loss in event-free days. Older adults' preference between the two effect summary measures has not been studied. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study using a quantitative survey and qualitative semi-structured interviews. For the survey, we enrolled 102 residents with hypertension at five senior housing facilities (mean age 81.3 years, 82 female, 95 white race). We randomly assigned respondents to either RMST-based (n = 49) or conventional decision aid (n = 53) about the benefits and harms of intensive versus standard blood pressure-lowering strategies and compared decision conflict scale (DCS) responses (range: 0 [no conflict] to 100 [maximum conflict]; <25 is associated with implementing decisions). We used a purposive sample of 23 survey respondents stratified by both their random assignment and DCS from the survey. Inductive qualitative thematic analysis explored complementary perspectives on preferred ways of summarizing treatment effects. Results: The mean (standard deviation) total DCS was 22.0 (14.3) for the conventional decision aid group and 16.7 (14.1) for the RMST-based decision aid group (p = 0.06), but the proportion of participants with a DCS <25 was higher in the RMST-based group (26 [49.1%] vs 34 [69.4%]; p = 0.04). Qualitative interviews suggested that, regardless of effect summary measure, older individuals' preference depended on their ability to clearly comprehend quantitative information, clarity of presentation in the visual aid, and inclusion of desired information. Conclusions: When choosing a blood pressure-lowering strategy, older adults' perceived uncertainty may be reduced with a time-based effect summary, although our study was underpowered to detect a statistically significant
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 537
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perceived norms for interactive teaching and their relationship to instructional decision-making: a mixed methods study
    Hora, Matthew T.
    Anderson, Craig
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 64 (04) : 573 - 592
  • [22] Age and gender differences in diagnostic decision-making of early heart failure: results of a mixed-methods interview-study using video vignettes
    Marx, Gabriella
    Koens, Sarah
    von dem Knesebeck, Olaf
    Scherer, Martin
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [23] Effect of Advance Care Planning on Surrogate Decision Makers' Preparedness for Decision Making: Results of a Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial
    Thiede, Elizabeth
    Levi, Benjamin H.
    Lipnick, Daniella
    Johnson, Rhonda
    La, In Seo
    Lehman, Erik B.
    Smith, Theresa
    Wiegand, Debra
    Green, Michael
    Van Scoy, Lauren Jodi
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 24 (07) : 982 - 993
  • [24] Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study
    Wortley, Sally
    Tong, Allison
    Lancsar, Emily
    Salkeld, Glenn
    Howard, Kirsten
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 15
  • [25] Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study
    Sally Wortley
    Allison Tong
    Emily Lancsar
    Glenn Salkeld
    Kirsten Howard
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15
  • [26] How do patients' values influence heart failure self-care decision-making?: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Karimi, Mehri
    Clark, Alexander M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2016, 59 : 89 - 104
  • [27] Police Expertise and Use of Force: Using a Mixed-Methods Approach to Model Expert and Novice Use-of-Force Decision-Making
    Laura Mangels
    Joel Suss
    Brian Lande
    Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2020, 35 : 294 - 303
  • [28] Police Expertise and Use of Force: Using a Mixed-Methods Approach to Model Expert and Novice Use-of-Force Decision-Making
    Mangels, Laura
    Suss, Joel
    Lande, Brian
    JOURNAL OF POLICE AND CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 35 (03) : 294 - 303
  • [29] Quality of life, recovery and decision-making: a mixed methods study of mental health recovery in social care
    Michael Coffey
    Ben Hannigan
    Alan Meudell
    Mari Jones
    Julian Hunt
    Deb Fitzsimmons
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2019, 54 : 715 - 723
  • [30] Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation
    Hoffmann, Christin
    Avery, Kerry
    Macefield, Rhiannon
    Dvorak, Tadeas
    Snelgrove, Val
    Blazeby, Jane
    Hopkins, Della
    Hickey, Shireen
    Gibbison, Ben
    Rooshenas, Leila
    Williams, Adam
    Aning, Jonathan
    Bekker, Hilary L.
    McNair, Angus G. K.
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 11