Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?

被引:3
作者
Robert, Jason Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, POB 874501, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
来源
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY | 2023年 / 30卷 / 07期
关键词
Misconduct in research; conflict of interest; ethics and public policy; responsible conduct of research; research integrity; RCR education and instruction; QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES;
D O I
10.1080/08989621.2021.2020110
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Virtually all of the scholarly literature on responsible conduct in research (RCR) focuses on the integrity of scientists - including why scientists misbehave, and how to improve training and enhance compliance with institutional and federal policies and regulations to prevent research misconduct. What this literature does not yet address is the integrity of those responsible for research administration. This article explores the responsible conduct of research administration and the potential for administrative misconduct. I highlight ways in which a lack of integrity in research administration can jeopardize the progress of science, the careers of researchers, and the reputation of institutions just as much as research misconduct can. Accordingly, I call for policies and appropriate oversight of research administration that are on par with policies governing research misconduct by scientists.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 458
页数:20
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] Using co-creation methods for research integrity guideline development - how, what, why and when?
    Labib, Krishma
    Pizzolato, Daniel
    Stappers, Pieter Jan
    Evans, Natalie
    Lechner, Iris
    Widdershoven, Guy
    Bouter, Lex
    Dierickx, Kris
    Bergema, Katinka
    Tijdink, Joeri
    [J]. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2024, 31 (06): : 531 - 556