Towards biomechanics-based pre-procedural planning for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic dissection

被引:2
作者
Kan, Xiaoxin [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Tao [3 ,4 ]
Jiang, Xiaolang [3 ,4 ]
Holzapfel, Gerhard A. [5 ,6 ]
Dong, Zhihui [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Xu, Xiao Yun [2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Jinshan Hosp, Ctr Vasc Surg & Wound Care, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, London, England
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Inst Vasc Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Biomech, Graz, Austria
[6] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Struct Engn, Trondheim, Norway
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Finite element analysis; Tevar; Type B aortic dissection; Stent-graft; Virtual stent-graft deployment; STENT-GRAFT DEPLOYMENT; SIMULATIONS; MECHANICS; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107994
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Although thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) has shown promising outcomes in the treatment of patients with complicated type B aortic dissection, complications still occur after TEVAR that can lead to catastrophic events. Biomechanical interactions between the stent-graft (SG) and the local aortic tissue play a critical role in determining the outcome of TEVAR. Different SG design may cause different biomechanical responses in the treated aorta, but such information is not known at the time of pre-procedural planning. By developing patient-specific virtual stent-graft deployment tools, it is possible to analyse and compare the biomechanical impact of different SGs on the local aorta for individual patients. Methods: A finite element based virtual SG deployment model was employed in this study. Computational simulations were performed on a patient-specific model of type B aortic dissection, accounting for details of the SG design and the hyperelastic behaviour of the aortic wall. Based on the geometry reconstructed from the preTEVAR CTA scan, the patient-specific aortic dissection model was created and pre-stressed. Parametric models of three different SG products (SG1, SG2 and SG3) were built with two different lengths for each design. The SG models incorporated different stent and graft materials, stent strut patterns, and assembly approaches. Using our validated SG deployment simulation framework, virtual trials were performed on the patient-specific aortic dissection model using different SG products and varying SG lengths. Conclusion: Simulation results for different SG products suggest that SG3 with a longer length (SG3-long) would be the most appropriate device for the individual patient. Compared to SG1-short (the SG deployed in the patient), SG3-long followed the true lumen tortuosity closely, resulted in a more uniform true lumen expansion and a significant reduction in peak stress in the distal landing zone. These simulation results are promising and demonstrate the feasibility of using the virtual SG deployment model to assist clinicians in pre-procedural planning.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Partial arch replacement of type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B dissection
    Nakajima, Tomohiro
    Iba, Yutaka
    Ogura, Keishi
    Kawaharada, Nobuyoshi
    EGYPTIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 75 (01)
  • [22] Aortic rupture of acute aortic dissection type treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)
    Pompa, V.
    Papi, P.
    Coletti, M.
    Bresadola, L.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (18) : 3743 - 3747
  • [23] Computational tools for thoracic endovascular aortic repair planning
    Auricchio, Ferdinando
    Conti, Michele
    Romarowski, Rodrigo M.
    De Beaufort, Hector W.
    Grassi, Viviana
    Trimarchi, Santi
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 26 (01): : 51 - 58
  • [24] Evaluation of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for the Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection Complicated by Malperfusion
    Kato, Hiroaki
    Kato, Noriyuki
    Ouchi, Takafumi
    Higashigawa, Takatoshi
    Ito, Hisato
    Nakajima, Ken
    Chino, Shuji
    Tokui, Toshiya
    Mizumoto, Toru
    Oue, Kensuke
    Ichikawa, Yasutaka
    Sakuma, Hajime
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 17 (03) : 248 - 254
  • [25] Factors Affecting Optimal Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Type B (IIIb) Aortic Dissection
    Chen, I-Ming
    Chen, Po-Lin
    Huang, Chun-Yang
    Weng, Shih-Hsien
    Chen, Wei-Yuan
    Shih, Chun-Che
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 40 (05) : 671 - 681
  • [26] Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated With Aortic Shrinkage After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aneurysmal Chronic Aortic Dissection
    Shijo, Takayuki
    Shimamura, Kazuo
    Maeda, Koichi
    Yamashita, Kizuku
    Ide, Toru
    Yamana, Fumio
    Takahara, Mitsuyoshi
    Kuratani, Toru
    Miyagawa, Shigeru
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2023,
  • [27] Reintervention after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair of Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    Cheng, Li
    Xiang, Dongqiao
    Zhang, Shan
    Zheng, Chuansheng
    Wu, Xiaoyan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [28] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection after renal transplantation
    Shu, Chang
    Xiong, QingGen
    Qiu, Jian
    Luo, MingYao
    Fang, Kun
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (53) : 91628 - 91635
  • [29] The surgical management of retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair
    Dun, Yaojun
    Shi, Yi
    Guo, Hongwei
    Liu, Yanxiang
    Zhang, Bowen
    Sun, Xiaogang
    Qian, Xiangyang
    Yu, Cuntao
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 30 (05) : 732 - 738
  • [30] Efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair versus medical therapy for treatment of type B aortic dissection
    Motawea, Karam R.
    Rouzan, Samah S.
    Elhalag, Rowan H.
    Abdelwahab, Abdelrhaman M.
    Al Hennawi, Hussam
    Elshenawy, Salem
    Mohamed, Mai Saad
    Chebl, Pensee
    Madian, Mohamed Salem
    Hewalla, Mostafa Elsayed Elsayed
    Swed, Sarya
    Hafez, Wael
    Sawaf, Bisher
    Kaspo, Samer
    Battikh, Naim
    Seijari, Mohammed Najdat
    Farwati, Amr
    Rakab, Amine
    BMC SURGERY, 2024, 24 (01)