Towards biomechanics-based pre-procedural planning for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic dissection

被引:2
|
作者
Kan, Xiaoxin [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Tao [3 ,4 ]
Jiang, Xiaolang [3 ,4 ]
Holzapfel, Gerhard A. [5 ,6 ]
Dong, Zhihui [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Xu, Xiao Yun [2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Jinshan Hosp, Ctr Vasc Surg & Wound Care, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, London, England
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Inst Vasc Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Biomech, Graz, Austria
[6] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Struct Engn, Trondheim, Norway
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Finite element analysis; Tevar; Type B aortic dissection; Stent-graft; Virtual stent-graft deployment; STENT-GRAFT DEPLOYMENT; SIMULATIONS; MECHANICS; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107994
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Although thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) has shown promising outcomes in the treatment of patients with complicated type B aortic dissection, complications still occur after TEVAR that can lead to catastrophic events. Biomechanical interactions between the stent-graft (SG) and the local aortic tissue play a critical role in determining the outcome of TEVAR. Different SG design may cause different biomechanical responses in the treated aorta, but such information is not known at the time of pre-procedural planning. By developing patient-specific virtual stent-graft deployment tools, it is possible to analyse and compare the biomechanical impact of different SGs on the local aorta for individual patients. Methods: A finite element based virtual SG deployment model was employed in this study. Computational simulations were performed on a patient-specific model of type B aortic dissection, accounting for details of the SG design and the hyperelastic behaviour of the aortic wall. Based on the geometry reconstructed from the preTEVAR CTA scan, the patient-specific aortic dissection model was created and pre-stressed. Parametric models of three different SG products (SG1, SG2 and SG3) were built with two different lengths for each design. The SG models incorporated different stent and graft materials, stent strut patterns, and assembly approaches. Using our validated SG deployment simulation framework, virtual trials were performed on the patient-specific aortic dissection model using different SG products and varying SG lengths. Conclusion: Simulation results for different SG products suggest that SG3 with a longer length (SG3-long) would be the most appropriate device for the individual patient. Compared to SG1-short (the SG deployed in the patient), SG3-long followed the true lumen tortuosity closely, resulted in a more uniform true lumen expansion and a significant reduction in peak stress in the distal landing zone. These simulation results are promising and demonstrate the feasibility of using the virtual SG deployment model to assist clinicians in pre-procedural planning.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Finite element modeling to predict procedural success of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in type A aortic dissection
    Yuan, Xun
    Kan, Xiaoxin
    Xu, Xiao Yun
    Nienaber, Christoph A.
    JTCVS TECHNIQUES, 2020, 4 : 40 - 47
  • [2] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for retrograde type A aortic dissection
    Higashigawa, Takatoshi
    Kato, Noriyuki
    Nakajima, Ken
    Chino, Shuji
    Hashimoto, Takashi
    Ouchi, Takafumi
    Tokui, Toshiya
    Maze, Yasumi
    Mizumoto, Toru
    Teranishi, Satoshi
    Yamamto, Naoki
    Ito, Hisato
    Sakuma, Hajime
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (06) : 1685 - 1693
  • [3] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Chronic DeBakey IIIb Aortic Dissection
    Hughes, G. Chad
    Ganapathi, Asvin M.
    Keenan, Jeffrey E.
    Englum, Brian R.
    Hanna, Jennifer M.
    Schechter, Matthew A.
    Wang, Hanghang
    McCann, Richard L.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 98 (06) : 2092 - 2098
  • [4] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection: Pre- and Postprocedural Imaging
    Shen, Jody
    Mastrodicasa, Domenico
    Al Bulushi, Yarab
    Lin, Margaret C.
    Tse, Justin R.
    Watkins, Amelia C.
    Lee, Jason T.
    Fleischmann, Dominik
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2022, 42 (06) : 1638 - 1653
  • [5] Retrograde Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Canaud, Ludovic
    Ozdemir, Baris A.
    Patterson, Benjamin O.
    Holt, Peter J. E.
    Loftus, Ian M.
    Thompson, Matt M.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 260 (02) : 389 - 395
  • [6] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Acute and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection
    Trimarchi, Santi
    Eagle, Kim A.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (02) : 192 - 194
  • [7] The Role of Thoracic Endovascular Repair in Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection
    Burke, Christopher R.
    Bavaria, Joseph E.
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 32 (01) : 21 - 24
  • [8] Retrograde type A dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection
    Yammine, Halim
    Briggs, Charles S.
    Stanley, Gregory A.
    Ballast, Jocelyn K.
    Anderson, William E.
    Nussbaum, Tzvi
    Madjarov, Jeko
    Frederick, John R.
    Arko, Frank R., III
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (01) : 24 - 32
  • [9] Techniques for repair of retrograde aortic dissection following thoracic endovascular aortic repair
    Desai, Nimesh D.
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 2 (03) : 369 - 371
  • [10] Surgical Repair of Two Kinds of Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Fang, Zhou
    Li, Haiyang
    Warburton, Thomas M.
    Zhu, Junming
    Liu, Yongmin
    Sun, Lizhong
    Jiang, Wenjian
    Zhang, Hongjia
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9