Does ecologization matter for technical efficiency in crop production? A case of Swedish agriculture

被引:4
作者
Huang, Wei [1 ]
Manevska-Tasevska, Gordana [1 ]
Hansson, Helena [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Econ, S-75005 Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Agroecology; Crop Diversity Index; FADN data; Stochastic frontier analysis; Organic farming; BIODIVERSITY; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; FARM;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107068
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effect of ecologisation on crop production performance in Sweden, measured as technical efficiency, was investigated by incorporating ecologisation into the production function and technical inefficiency determinant model. An unbalanced panel of data from the Swedish Farm Accounting Data Network (FADN), comprising 1944 observations on 346 crop farms 2009-2019, was used in stochastic frontier analysis. Ecologisation indicators considered were crop diversity index, organic farming, and environmental subsidies. The results showed that ecologisation affected the technical efficiency of crop production. Crop diversity index for the current year and the two preceding years had a positive effect on performance, with crop diversity index for current year in particular being positively associated with production performance of crop production. Organic farming was estimated to be negatively significantly associated with production performance. Rural subsidies were positively associated with production performance, but no association was found between environmental subsidies and production performance. Mean technical efficiency was 0.715, with higher values in southern Sweden than northern Sweden. These findings on the impact of ecologisation on arable farming can be useful when designing policies to encourage farmers to adopt ecologisation approaches.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Allen P., 1991, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, V6, P34, DOI 10.1017/S0889189300003787
  • [2] Battese G.E., 1992, J PROD ANAL, V3, P153, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00158774
  • [3] Do different types of Common Agricultural Policy subsidies promote farm employment?
    Bojnec, Stefan
    Ferto, Imre
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 112
  • [4] Brümmer B, 2002, AM J AGR ECON, V84, P628, DOI 10.1111/1467-8276.00324
  • [5] Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference
    Cardinale, BJ
    Ives, AR
    Inchausti, P
    [J]. OIKOS, 2004, 104 (03) : 437 - 450
  • [6] Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
    Cardinale, Bradley J.
    Duffy, J. Emmett
    Gonzalez, Andrew
    Hooper, David U.
    Perrings, Charles
    Venail, Patrick
    Narwani, Anita
    Mace, Georgina M.
    Tilman, David
    Wardle, David A.
    Kinzig, Ann P.
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    Loreau, Michel
    Grace, James B.
    Larigauderie, Anne
    Srivastava, Diane S.
    Naeem, Shahid
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 486 (7401) : 59 - 67
  • [7] Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice
    Clark, Michael
    Tilman, David
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [8] The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture
    de Ponti, Tomek
    Rijk, Bert
    van Ittersum, Martin K.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 108 : 1 - 9
  • [9] Rainfall shocks, resilience, and the effects of crop biodiversity on agroecosystem productivity
    Di Falco, Salvatore
    Chavas, Jean-Paul
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2008, 84 (01) : 83 - 96
  • [10] Feola G., 2012, Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic