CEO narcissism and cross-boundary growth: Evidence from Chinese publicly listed manufacturing firms

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Lin [1 ]
Yang, Jingyi [2 ]
Zhang, Chenjian [3 ]
Lu, Liangliang [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Int Business Sch, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Bath, England
[4] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
CEO narcissism; Firms' cross-boundary growth; Corporate ownership; Ownership concentration; China; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; EMERGING ECONOMIES; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SELF-EVALUATIONS; MODERATING ROLE; RISK-TAKING; DIVERSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1057/s41291-023-00246-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Prior research has shown that CEO narcissism can significantly impact firms' strategic decision-making and performance. Additionally, studies on cross-boundary growth have demonstrated its positive effect on firms' financial performance. However, little is known about the relationship between CEO narcissism and firms' cross-boundary growth. In this study, we integrate upper echelon theory and agency theory and propose that CEO narcissism has a positive effect on a firms' cross-boundary growth, both domestically and internationally. Furthermore, different types of corporate ownership and ownership concentration have varying effects on this relationship. Our research analyzed publicly listed manufacturing firms in China from 2005 to 2014 and found supportive evidence for our hypotheses. This study offers insight into how micro factors, such as CEO narcissism, can affect a firms' growth strategy. Our study further sheds light on the differentiating role of corporate ownership and ownership concertation in affecting this relationship.
引用
收藏
页码:2164 / 2188
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do Cross-Listed Firms Have a Better Governance Structure and Lower Agency Costs? Evidence from Chinese Firms
    Kim, Dong-Soon
    Yeo, Eunjung
    Zhang, Li
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 25
  • [22] Ownership structure and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from publicly listed private firms in China
    Richardson, Grant
    Wang, Bei
    Zhang, Xinmin
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2016, 12 (02) : 141 - 158
  • [23] OFDI and stock returns: Evidence from manufacturing firms listed on the Chinese A-shares market
    Wang Xiaosong
    Wu Huan
    Thye, Woo Wing
    Xie Shenxiang
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2021, 74
  • [24] Does ownership matter in publicly listed tourism firms? Evidence from Jordan
    Al-Najjar, Basil
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2015, 49 : 87 - 96
  • [25] OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE, ACQUISITIONS AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: EVIDENCE FROM PUBLICLY LISTED CHINESE COMPANIES
    Kang, Lili
    Anwar, Sajid
    Peng, Fei
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023, 68 (01) : 285 - 315
  • [26] Will CEO-TMT Overseas Experience Differences Reduce Innovation Investment? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Listed Companies
    Xu, Zhaocheng
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (01) : 771 - 800
  • [27] Corporate governance, human capital, and productivity: evidence from Chinese non-listed firms
    Kong, Gaowen
    Kong, Dongmin
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (27) : 2655 - 2668
  • [28] The effect of institutional ownership on firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms
    Rong, Zhao
    Wu, Xiaokai
    Boeing, Philipp
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (09) : 1533 - 1551
  • [29] Home institutions, internationalization and firm performance Evidence from listed Chinese firms
    Chen, Yan
    Zhai, Rui-Rui
    Wang, Chengqi
    Zhong, Changbiao
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2015, 53 (01) : 160 - 178
  • [30] Political Incentives to Suppress Negative Information: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms
    Piotroski, Joseph D.
    Wong, T. J.
    Zhang, Tianyu
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (02) : 405 - 459