Global Sensitivity Analysis in Aerodynamic Design Using Shapley Effects and Polynomial Chaos Regression

被引:0
作者
Palar, Pramudita Satria [1 ]
Zuhal, Lavi Rizki [1 ]
Shimoyama, Koji [2 ]
机构
[1] Bandung Inst Technol, Fac Mech & Aerosp Engn, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
[2] Kyushu Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan
关键词
Aerodynamics; Input variables; Computational modeling; Uncertainty; Sensitivity analysis; Probability density function; Estimation; Chaos; Global sensitivity analysis; Shapley effects; polynomial chaos expansion; aerodynamics; EXPANSION; INDEXES; UNCERTAINTY; BOOTSTRAP;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3324918
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Quantifying the impact of design variables in aerodynamic design exploration can provide valuable insights to designers. Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) is a crucial tool in aerodynamic design exploration that enables designers to gain valuable insights by quantifying the impact of design variables. In the field of GSA, the Shapley effect is a powerful alternative to total Sobol indices due to several mathematical advantages of the former. However, computing the Shapley effect is computationally expensive due to the large number of permutations involved. To overcome this challenge, surrogate models are often used to accurately estimate Shapley effects while reducing the number of function calls. This paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of using PCE to compute Shapley effects for independent inputs in aerodynamic design exploration. The exact calculation from PCE also enables the rapid assessment of confidence intervals for Shapley effects, taking into account the randomness in the experimental design via bootstrap resampling. The usefulness of Shapley effects with PCE is then demonstrated and compared with total Sobol indices through a nonlinear test function and three engineering problems, including subsonic wing, transonic airfoil, and fan blade design. The results also show that the confidence intervals of the Shapley effects are narrower than those of total Sobol indices, allowing better interpretation and higher confidence on the estimated GSA metric.
引用
收藏
页码:114825 / 114839
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   SAMBA: Sparse Approximation of Moment-Based Arbitrary Polynomial Chaos [J].
Ahlfeld, R. ;
Belkouchi, B. ;
Montomoli, F. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2016, 320 :1-16
[2]   Random forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review [J].
Antoniadis, Anestis ;
Lambert-Lacroix, Sophie ;
Poggi, Jean-Michel .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 206
[3]  
Benoumechiara Nazih, 2019, ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys, V65, P267, DOI 10.1051/proc/201965266
[4]   Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression [J].
Blatman, Geraud ;
Sudret, Bruno .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2011, 230 (06) :2345-2367
[5]   Numerical analysis and design optimization of supersonic after-burning with strut fuel injectors for scramjet engines [J].
Candon, M. J. ;
Ogawa, H. .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2018, 147 :281-296
[6]   Surrogate-assisted global sensitivity analysis: an overview [J].
Cheng, Kai ;
Lu, Zhenzhou ;
Ling, Chunyan ;
Zhou, Suting .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 61 (03) :1187-1213
[7]   Global sensitivity analysis using support vector regression [J].
Cheng, Kai ;
Lu, Zhenzhou ;
Zhou, Yicheng ;
Shi, Yan ;
Wei, Yuhao .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2017, 49 :587-598
[8]   Global sensitivity metrics from active subspaces [J].
Constantine, Paul G. ;
Diaz, Paul .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 162 :1-13
[9]   Exploiting Adjoint Derivatives in High-Dimensional Metamodels [J].
de Baar, J. H. S. ;
Scholcz, T. P. ;
Dwight, R. P. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2015, 53 (05) :1391-U298
[10]   Construction of bootstrap confidence intervals on sensitivity indices computed by polynomial chaos expansion [J].
Dubreuil, S. ;
Berveiller, M. ;
Petitjean, F. ;
Salauen, M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 121 :263-275