Evidence into practice: a national cohort study of NICE-recommended oncological drug therapy utilisation among women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in England

被引:3
作者
Gannon, Melissa Ruth [1 ,2 ]
Dodwell, David [3 ]
Aggarwal, Ajay [1 ,4 ]
Park, Min Hae [1 ,2 ]
Miller, Katie [1 ,2 ]
Horgan, Kieran [5 ]
Clements, Karen [6 ]
Medina, Jibby [1 ,2 ]
Cromwell, David Alan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London, England
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons England, Clin Effectiveness Unit, London, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Populat Hlth, Oxford, England
[4] Guys & St Thomas NHS Trust, Guys Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, London, England
[5] St James Univ Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] NHS England, 5th Floor,23 Stephenson St, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
TIME-SERIES ANALYSIS; TREATMENT PATTERNS; PALBOCICLIB; GUIDANCE; NHS;
D O I
10.1038/s41416-023-02439-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundMultiple drug treatments are approved for invasive breast cancer (IBC). We investigated uptake of NICE-recommended oncological drugs and variation by age, comorbidity burden and geographical region.MethodsWomen (aged 50+ years) diagnosed with IBC from 2014 to 2019, were identified from England Cancer Registry data and drug utilisation from Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy data. Interrupted time series analysis assessed national-level changes in drug use after publication of NICE recommendations. Regression models analysed variation in use.ResultsThis national cohort included 168,449 women. Use of drugs recommended for first-line treatment varied, from 26.6% for CDK 4/6 inhibitors to 63.8% for HER2-targeting therapies. Utilisation of drugs with a NICE recommendation published between 2014 and 2019, increased among patients diagnosed around the time of publication, except in the case of pertuzumab for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) which was previously accessible via the Cancer Drugs Fund (though use of pertuzumab for MBC increased from 34.1% to 75.0% across the study period). Use of trastuzumab and neoadjuvant/adjuvant pertuzumab varied by geographical region. Use was low for ribociclib (2.2%), abemaciclib (2.3%) and for drugs recommended beyond the first-line setting. For all drugs, use after NICE recommendation varied by age at diagnosis and increased as stage increased.ConclusionsUse of NICE-recommended drugs for IBC in routine care is variable, with lowest use among women aged 70+ years. Improving access to effective treatments is an important step in improving outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1569 / 1579
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]   Initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab for human epidermal growth receptor 2-positive early invasive breast cancer in a population-based cohort study of older women in England [J].
Gannon, Melissa Ruth ;
Dodwell, David ;
Jauhari, Yasmin ;
Horgan, Kieran ;
Clements, Karen ;
Medina, Jibby ;
Cromwell, David Alan .
JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 11 (05) :836-842
[22]   Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab for Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Real World Experience [J].
Hall, Benjamin James ;
Bhojwani, Ajay Ashok ;
Wong, Helen ;
Law, Andrea ;
Flint, Helen ;
Ahmed, Eliyaz ;
Innes, Helen ;
Cliff, Joanne ;
Malik, Zaf ;
O'Hagan, Julie Elizabeth ;
Hall, Allison ;
Sripadam, Rajaram ;
Tolan, Shaun ;
Ali, Zulfiqar ;
Hart, Clare ;
Errington, Douglas ;
Alam, Farida ;
Giuliani, Rosa ;
Mehta, Shaveta ;
Khanduri, Sheena ;
Thorp, Nicky ;
Jackson, Richard ;
Cicconi, Silvia ;
Palmieri, Carlo .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2022, 2022
[23]   Cohort profile: prescriptions dispensed in the community linked to the national cancer registry in England [J].
Henson, Katherine E. ;
Brock, Rachael ;
Shand, Brian ;
Coupland, Victoria H. ;
Elliss-Brookes, Lucy ;
Lyratzopoulos, Georgios ;
Godfrey, Philip ;
Haigh, Abigail ;
Hunter, Kelvin ;
McCabe, Martin G. ;
Mitchell, Graham ;
Monckton, Nina ;
Robson, Robert ;
Round, Thomas ;
Wong, Kwok ;
Rashbass, Jem .
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (07)
[24]   Adjuvant and neoadjuvant breast cancer treatments: A systematic review of their effects on mortality [J].
Kerr, Amanda J. ;
Dodwell, David ;
McGale, Paul ;
Holt, Francesca ;
Duane, Fran ;
Mannu, Gurdeep ;
Darby, Sarah C. ;
Taylor, Carolyn W. .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2022, 105
[25]   FDA and EMA Approvals of New Breast Cancer Drugs-A Comparative Regulatory Analysis [J].
Leo, Chandra P. ;
Hentschel, Bettina ;
Szucs, Thomas D. ;
Leo, Cornelia .
CANCERS, 2020, 12 (02)
[26]   Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes with palbociclib-based therapy received in US community oncology practices [J].
Lin, Junji ;
McRoy, Lynn ;
Fisher, Maxine D. ;
Hu, Nan ;
Davis, Cralen ;
Mitra, Debanjali ;
Walker, Mark S. .
FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2021, 17 (09) :1001-1011
[27]   Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons [J].
Linden, Ariel .
STATA JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (02) :480-500
[28]   Cancer Therapy Approval Timings, Review Speed, and Publication of Pivotal Registration Trials in the US and Europe, 2010-2019 [J].
Lythgoe, Mark P. ;
Desai, Aakash ;
Gyawali, Bishal ;
Savage, Philip ;
Krell, Jonathan ;
Warner, Jeremy L. ;
Khaki, Ali Raza .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (06) :E2216183
[29]   Biosimilars for breast cancer: a review of HER2-targeted antibodies in the United States [J].
Miller, Emily M. ;
Schwartzberg, Lee S. .
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 11
[30]  
National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, 2014, Matching SACT to Cancer Waiting Times Data